Consumer rationality and consumer sovereignty

被引:23
作者
Redmond, WH [1 ]
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
关键词
rationality; rational choice; consumer sovereignty; saving; decision making; policy;
D O I
10.1080/003467600402530
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Important social benefits of the market system are predicated on the assumption that consumers can effectively pursue their interest in the marketplace. Cause for concern exists to the extent that high consumption expenditures lead to relatively low levels of personal savings in the U.S. To the extent that they do, in fact, over spend, consumers appear to deviate from economic assumptions of rationality. This paper examines four conceptions of rationality (two variants of rational choice theory, institutionalism, and one derived from economic sociology), with a view to evaluating implications for consumer sovereignty under each. By explicitly accounting for differences among individuals, economic sociology appears to offer more realistic policy solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 196
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Consumer Sovereignty and Human Interests
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, LIMITS RATIONALITY
[3]  
[Anonymous], PROTESTANT ETHIC SPI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1954, POST KEYNESIAN EC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, SOCIOECONOMICS NEW S
[6]  
[Anonymous], HDB EC SOCIOLOGY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AM SOCIOL, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12108-997-1005-4
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1953, THEORY LEISURE CLASS
[9]  
Becker G., 1996, ACCOUNTING TASTES, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674020658
[10]  
Becker GS, 1976, EC APPROACH HUMAN BE