The utility of supplemental oxygen during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia with midazolam and fentanyl: A randomized, controlled trial

被引:68
作者
Deitch, Kenneth [1 ]
Chudnofsky, Carl R. [1 ]
Dominici, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To determine whether supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of hypoxia by 20% in study patients receiving midazolam and fentanyl for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive either supplemental oxygen or compressed air by nasal cannula at 2 L per minute. Physicians were blinded to the gas used and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) data. Respiratory depression was defined a priori as oxygen saturation less than 90%, ETCO2 level greater than 50 mm Hg, an absolute change from baseline of 10 mm Hg, or loss of the ETCO2 waveform. Results: Of the 80 patients analyzed, 44 received supplemental oxygen and 36 received compressed air. Twenty supplemental oxygen patients and 19 compressed air patients met at least 1 criterion for respiratory depression. Six supplemental oxygen patients and 5 compressed air patients experienced hypoxia (P=.97; effect size 0%; 95% confidence interval -15% to +15%). Fourteen patients in each group met ETCO2 criteria for respiratory depression but were not hypoxic. Physicians identified respiratory depression in 8 of 11 patients who became hypoxic and 0 of 28 patients who met ETCO2 criteria for respiratory depression but who did not become hypoxic. There were no adverse events. Conclusion: Supplemental oxygen did not reduce (or trend toward reducing) the incidence of hypoxia in patients moderately sedated with midazolam and fentanyl. However, our lower-than-expected rate of hypoxia limits the power of this comparison. Blinded capnography frequently identified respiratory depression undetected by the treating physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Noninvasive capnometry monitoring for respiratory status during pediatric seizures [J].
Abramo, TJ ;
Wiebe, RA ;
Scott, S ;
Goto, CS ;
McIntire, DD .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (07) :1242-1246
[2]  
BOSE EA, 1989, J CLIN MONITOR, V5, P105
[3]  
Chudnofsky CR, 2006, ROSENS EMERGENCY MED, P2938
[4]   Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review [J].
De Jonghe, B ;
Cook, D ;
Appere-De-Vecchi, C ;
Guyatt, G ;
Meade, M ;
Outin, H .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 26 (03) :275-285
[5]   End-tidal PCO2 monitoring via nasal cannulae in pediatric patients: Accuracy and sources of error [J].
Friesen, RH ;
Alswang, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING, 1996, 12 (02) :155-159
[6]  
Gross JB, 2002, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V96, P1004
[7]   The value of end-tidal CO2 monitoring when comparing three methods of conscious sedation for children undergoing painful procedures in the emergency department [J].
Hart, LS ;
Berns, SD ;
Houck, CS ;
Boenning, DA .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 1997, 13 (03) :189-193
[8]   A clinical trial of propofol vs midazolam for procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department [J].
Havel, CJ ;
Strait, RT ;
Hennes, H .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (10) :989-997
[9]   Etomidate and midazolam for procedural sedation: prospective, randomized trial [J].
Hunt, GS ;
Spencer, MT ;
Hays, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (03) :299-303
[10]   Comparison of fentanyl/midazolam with ketamine/midazolam for pediatric orthopedic emergencies [J].
Kennedy, RM ;
Porter, FL ;
Miller, JP ;
Jaffe, DM .
PEDIATRICS, 1998, 102 (04) :956-963