New fetal weight estimation models using fractional limb volume

被引:69
作者
Lee, W. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Balasubramaniam, M. [2 ]
Deter, R. L. [6 ]
Yeo, L. [3 ,5 ]
Hassan, S. S. [3 ,5 ]
Gotsch, F. [5 ]
Kusanovic, J. P. [3 ,5 ]
Goncalves, L. F. [3 ,5 ]
Romero, R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Oakland Univ, William Beaumont Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Fetal Imaging, Royal Oak, MI USA
[2] William Beaumont Hosp, Res Inst, Div Biostat, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Hutzel Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Ctr Mol Med & Genet, Detroit, MI USA
[5] NICHD, Perinatol Res Branch, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD USA
[6] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
birth weight; body composition; estimated fetal weight; fetal growth; fetal soft tissue; fetal weight; fractional arm volume; fractional limb volume; fractional thigh volume; TO-CHEEK DIAMETER; BIRTH-WEIGHT; BODY-COMPOSITION; SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION; TISSUE THICKNESS; MENSTRUAL AGE; FEMUR LENGTH; GROWTH; ULTRASOUND; CIRCUMFERENCE;
D O I
10.1002/uog.7327
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives The main goal of this study was to determine the accuracy and precision of new fetal weight estimation Models, based on fractional limb volume and conventional two-dimensional (2D) sonographic measurements during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study of 271 fetuses was performed using three-dimensional ultrasonography to extract standard measurements - biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femoral diaphysis length (FDL) - plus fractional arm volume (AVol) and fractional thigh volume (TVol) within 4 days of delivery. Weighted multiple linear regression analysis was used to develop 'modified Hadlock' models and new models using transformed predictors that included soft tissue parameters for estimating birth weight. Estimated and observed birth weights were compared using mean percent difference (systematic weight estimation error) and the SD of the percent differences (random weight estimation error). The proportion of newborns with estimated birth weight within 5 or 10% of actual birth weight were compared using McNemar's test. Results Birth weights in the study group ranged from 235 to 5790 g, with equal proportions of male and female infants. Six new fetal weight estimation models were compared with the results for modified Hadlock models with sample-specific coefficients. All the new models were very accurate, with mean percent differences that were not significantly different from zero. Model 3 (which used the natural logarithms of BPD, AC and AVol) and Model 6 (which used the natural logarithms of BPD, AC and TVol) provided the most precise weight estimations (random error = 6.6% of actual birth weight) as compared with 8.5% for the best original Hadlock model and 7.6% for a modified Hadlock model using sample-specific coefficients. Model 5 (which used the natural logarithms of A C and TVol) classified an additional 9.1% and 8.3% of the fetuses within 5% and 10% of actual birth weight and Model 6 classified an additional 7.3% and 4.1% of infants within 5% and 10% of actual birth weight. Conclusion The precision of fetal weight estimation can be improved by adding fractional limb volume measurements to conventional 2D biometry. New models that consider fractional limb volume may offer novel insight into the contribution of soft tissue development to weight estimation. Copyright (C) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 565
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]   Comparison of Estimated Fetal Weights Using Volume and 2-Dimensional Sonography and Their Relationship to Neonatal Markers of Fat [J].
Khoury, Fadi R. ;
Stetzer, Brad ;
Myers, Stephen A. ;
Mercer, Brian .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (03) :309-315
[32]   Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition [J].
Larciprete, G ;
Valensise, H ;
DI Pierro, G ;
Vasapollo, B ;
Casalino, B ;
Arduini, D ;
Jarvis, S ;
Cirese, E .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 26 (03) :258-262
[33]   Fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT) in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies [J].
Larciprete, G ;
Valensise, H ;
Vasapollo, B ;
Novelli, GP ;
Parretti, E ;
Altomare, F ;
Di Pierro, G ;
Menghini, S ;
Barbati, G ;
Mello, G ;
Arduini, D .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 22 (06) :591-597
[34]   Could birthweight prediction models be improved by adding fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness? [J].
Larciprete, Giovanni ;
Di Pierro, Giuseppe ;
Barbati, Giulia ;
Deaibess, Therese ;
Jarvis, Sheba ;
Valensise, Herbert ;
Romanini, Maria Elisabetta ;
Gioia, Stefano ;
Arduini, Domenico .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 34 (01) :18-26
[35]   INITIATION OF HYPERTENSION INUTERO AND ITS AMPLIFICATION THROUGHOUT LIFE [J].
LAW, CM ;
DESWIET, M ;
OSMOND, C ;
FAYERS, PM ;
BARKER, DJP ;
CRUDDAS, AM ;
FALL, CHD .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6869) :24-27
[36]   Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: their relationship to neonatal body composition [J].
Lee, W. ;
Balasubramaniam, M. ;
Deter, R. L. ;
Hassan, S. S. ;
Gotsch, F. ;
Kusanovic, J. P. ;
Goncalves, L. F. ;
Romero, R. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (04) :441-446
[37]   Fractional limb volume - a soft tissue parameter of fetal body composition: validation, technical considerations and normal ranges during pregnancy [J].
Lee, W. ;
Balasubramaniam, M. ;
Deter, R. L. ;
Hassan, S. S. ;
Gotsch, F. ;
Kusanovic, J. P. ;
Goncalves, L. F. ;
Romero, R. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (04) :427-440
[38]  
Lee W, 2001, J ULTRAS MED, V20, P1283
[39]   Predicting birth weight by fetal upper-arm volume with use of three-dimensional ultrasonography [J].
Liang, RI ;
Chang, FM ;
Yao, BL ;
Chang, CH ;
Yu, CH ;
Ko, HC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (03) :632-638
[40]   Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods [J].
Lindell, G. ;
Marsal, K. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (03) :295-300