Post Hoc Power: Not Empowering, Just Misleading

被引：55

作者：

Althouse, Andrew D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, 200 Meyran Ave,Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH | 2021年 / 259卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.049

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：A3 / A6

页数：4

共 7 条

[1] Is the Power Threshold of 0.8 Applicable to Surgical Science?-Empowering the Underpowered Study [J].

Bababekov, Yanik J. ;

Hung, Ya-Ching ;

Hsu, Yu-Tien ;

Udelsman, Brooks, V ;

Mueller, Jessica L. ;

Lin, Hsu-Ying ;

Stapleton, Sahael M. ;

Chang, David C. .

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 241 :235-239

[2] THE USE OF PREDICTED CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS WHEN PLANNING EXPERIMENTS AND THE MISUSE OF POWER WHEN INTERPRETING RESULTS [J].

GOODMAN, SN ;

BERLIN, JA .

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (03) :200-206

[3] The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis [J].

Hoenig, JM ;

Heisey, DM .

AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (01) :19-24

[4]

Lakens D., 2014, OBSERVED POWER WHAT

[5] Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination [J].

Lenth, RV .

AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (03) :187-193

[6] Post hoc power analysis: An idea whose time has passed? [J].

Levine, M ;

Ensom, MHH .

PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2001, 21 (04) :405-409

[7] Post Hoc Power, Observed Power, A Priori Power, Retrospective Power, Prospective Power, Achieved Power: Sorting Out Appropriate Uses of Statistical Power Analyses [J].

O'Keefe, Daniel J. .

COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2007, 1 (04) :291-299

← 1 →