Predicting employee wrongdoing: The complementary effect of CEO option pay and the pay gap

被引:5
作者
Smulowitz, Stephen J. [1 ]
Almandoz, Juan [2 ]
机构
[1] IMD Global Board Ctr, IMD Ch Bellerive 23,POB 915, CH-1001 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] IESE Business Sch, 165 W 57th St, New York, NY 10025 USA
关键词
Pay gap; CEO compensation; Wrongdoing; Corporate governance; Banks; AGENCY COSTS; FIRM; COMPENSATION; PERFORMANCE; DECISIONS; THEFT; WORK; ORGANIZATIONS; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.018
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research examining the influence of executive compensation on organizational wrongdoing has focused on pay's incentive aspects. However, existing theory in sociology and social psychology has argued that executive pay can also have a social aspect, by increasing feelings of injustice, unfairness and envy. We find evidence that employee wrongdoing may be significantly explained by the simultaneous presence of employee opportunity and motivation for wrongdoing, which relate to the incentive and social aspects of CEO pay, respectively. Using a sample of U.S. banks from 2007 to 2013, we examine the relationship of CEO option pay and the pay gap (i.e., the ratio of CEO total pay to average employee pay) with the likelihood of employee wrongdoing. We find evidence that the pay gap moderates the positive relationship between CEO option pay and the likelihood of employee wrongdoing, suggesting complementarities between the incentive and social aspects of CEO pay.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 135
页数:13
相关论文
共 99 条
[81]  
Schein E. H., 2010, ORG CULTURE LEADERSH, V2
[82]   Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime [J].
Schnatterly, K .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (07) :587-614
[83]   BUYING BAD BEHAVIOR: TOURNAMENT INCENTIVES AND SECURITIES CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS [J].
Shi, Wei ;
Connelly, Brian L. ;
Sanders, Wm. Gerard .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (07) :1354-1378
[84]   Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms [J].
Siegel, PA ;
Hambrick, DC .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (03) :259-274
[85]   Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice [J].
Skarlicki, DP ;
Folger, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (03) :434-443
[86]   The behavioral theory of the (community-oriented) firm: The differing response of community-oriented firms to performance relative to aspirations [J].
Smulowitz, Stephen J. ;
Rousseau, Horacio E. ;
Bromiley, Philip .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (06) :1023-1053
[87]  
Sorge M., 1984, Automotive News, V59, P24
[88]   Self-Gain or Self-Regulation Impairment? Tests of Competing Explanations of the Supervisor Abuse and Employee Deviance Relationship Through Perceptions of Distributive Justice [J].
Thau, Stefan ;
Mitchell, Marie S. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (06) :1009-1031
[89]  
Thibaut John W., 1975, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE P
[90]   Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness [J].
Turillo, CJ ;
Folger, R ;
Lavelle, JJ ;
Umphress, EE ;
Gee, JO .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 89 (01) :839-865