The role of diagnostics as a means of engaged scholarship and enhancing SME research

被引:8
作者
Gilman, Mark [1 ]
Salder, Jacob [2 ]
机构
[1] Birmingham City Business Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
diagnostic; engaged scholarship; research methods; SME growth; SME research; FIRM GROWTH; ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; RELEVANCE; COLLABORATION; KNOWLEDGE; SUPPORT; IMPACT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1177/1465750320969614
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the methodological challenges facing SME researchers through overdependence on quantitative methods. It proposes how a diagnostic-based form of engaged scholarship can enhance the portfolio of research tools and address existing deficits in current research methods by building on tools developed as part of a multi-determinant research process for exploring SME growth. The paper argues existing methods of SME research are insufficient to address their heterogeneous and context-dependent nature. New tools are therefore required to mitigate embedded shortcomings in terms of depth and breadth of understanding alongside impact for practice and for SMEs as active stakeholders in the research process. The design and implementation of diagnostic tools has the scope to address these deficits. The benefit of this paper is to outline an additional approach to SME research which addresses embedded issues in existing methods. It proposes a tool that addresses certain academic research challenges, but also integrates research more substantially with policy and SME requirements. In thus doing it makes a novel contribution to debates on how SME research is undertaken, to the development of methodological tools appropriate for dealing with the challenges of contemporary research, and to methodological approaches integrating research within wider networks and communities.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 111
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, gazelles and elephants [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Mueller, Pamela .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (01) :85-100
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, VIT 6 PER CENT
[3]   Beyond co-production: practice-relevant scholarship as a foundation for delivering impact through powerful ideas [J].
Antonacopoulou, Elena P. .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (04) :219-226
[4]   Come on out of the ghetto, please! - Building the future of entrepreneurship research [J].
Baker, Ted ;
Welter, Friederike .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (02) :170-184
[5]   Bridging the Research-Practice Gap [J].
Bansal, Pratima ;
Bertels, Stephanie ;
Ewart, Tom ;
MacConnachie, Peter ;
O'Brien, James .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (01) :73-92
[6]   Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge [J].
Barge, J. Kevin ;
Shockley-Zalabak, Pamela .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (03) :251-265
[7]   Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration [J].
Bartunek, Jean M. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (06) :1323-1333
[8]   Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike: The Paradoxes of Academic-Practitioner Relationships [J].
Bartunek, Jean Marie ;
Rynes, Sara Lynn .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1181-1201
[9]  
Baum JAC, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-8