Large-for-gestational age diagnosed during second-trimester anatomy ultrasound and association with gestational diabetes and large-for-gestational age at birth

被引:8
|
作者
Rekawek, P. [1 ]
Liu, L. [1 ]
Getrajdman, C. [2 ]
Brooks, C. [3 ]
Pan, S. [4 ]
Overbey, J. [4 ]
Wagner, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, 5 East 98th St,2nd Floor, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
estimated fetal weight; gestational diabetes; large-for-gestational age; LGA; ultrasound; FETAL WEIGHT; 2ND; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1002/uog.21930
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine if large-for-gestational age (LGA) diagnosed during second-trimester ultrasound examination is associated with the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and LGA at birth. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of all pregnant women who underwent a second-trimester anatomy ultrasound examination between 18 and 22 weeks at our institution from 2012 to 2017. Patients were included in the LGA group if estimated fetal weight and/or fetal abdominal circumference was >= 90th percentile for gestational age. Patients with a history of pre-GDM, multiple gestation, preterm delivery, use of betamethasone or fetal anomaly were excluded. The control group consisted of appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) pregnancies that were scanned at 18-22 weeks during the study period. AGA was defined as EFW > 10th percentile and <= 89th percentile. Prenatal and delivery records were reviewed and demographic and outcome variables were collected. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to assess the impact of LGA diagnosed in the second trimester on the development of GDM and LGA at birth (birth weight >= 90th percentile). Results The study population included 756 patients with a LGA fetus and 756 with an AGA fetus on second-trimester ultrasound examination. In patients with a LGA fetus diagnosed during the second-trimester ultrasound examination, the incidence of GDM was 6.0% and the incidence of LGA at birth was 14.9%. Among patients with a LGA fetus in the second trimester, those who developed GDM or LGA at birth were significantly older and were more likely to be obese. Moreover, parity was associated with neonatal LGA (P=0.0003) but not with GDM (P=0.82). On multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, parity, change in gestational body mass index, obesity, ethnicity and neonatal sex, LGA diagnosed during the second trimester was associated significantly with GDM(adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.54; 95% CI, 1.29-5.03; P=0.007) and LGA at birth (aOR, 6.85; 95% CI, 3.60-13.05; P<0.0001). Conclusions LGA diagnosed during second-trimester ultrasound examination is associated with the development of GDM and LGA at birth, independent of known risk factors, and could be used to identify these women earlier for intervention. Copyright (C) 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 905
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of ultrasound with biomarkers to identify large-for-gestational age in women screened for gestational diabetes mellitus
    O'Malley, Eimer G.
    Reynolds, Ciara M. E.
    Killalea, Anne
    O'Kelly, Ruth
    Sheehan, Sharon R.
    Turner, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 6306 - 6311
  • [2] Large-for-Gestational Age: A Biomarker of Childhood Obesity
    Mehta, Shobha H.
    Kruger, Michael
    Liveright, Elizabeth
    Sokol, Robert C.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (03) : 142A - 143A
  • [3] Unemployment during the Great Recession and large-for-gestational age births
    Oddo, Vanessa M.
    Jones-Smith, Jessica C.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [4] Large-for-gestational age and stillbirth: is there a role for antenatal testing?
    Carter, E. B.
    Stockburger, J.
    Tuuli, M. G.
    Macones, G. A.
    Odibo, A. O.
    Trudell, A. S.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (03) : 334 - 337
  • [5] NEONATAL OUTCOMES OF LARGE-FOR-GESTATIONAL AGE INFANTS DELIVERED BY WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS?
    Onal, E.
    Hirfanoglu, I. M.
    Beken, S.
    Altuntas, N.
    Turkyilmaz, C.
    Turan, O.
    Ergenekon, E.
    Koc, E.
    Atalay, Y.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 611 - 611
  • [6] Cord blood adiponectin in large-for-gestational age newborns
    Mazaki-Tovi, S
    Kanety, H
    Pariente, C
    Hemi, R
    Schiff, E
    Sivan, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (03) : 1238 - 1242
  • [7] Decreased placental apoptosis and autophagy in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes with large-for-gestational age fetuses
    Hung, Tai-Ho
    Huang, Shih-Yin
    Chen, Szu-Fu
    Wu, Chung-Pu
    Hsieh, T'sang-T'ang
    PLACENTA, 2020, 90 : 27 - 36
  • [8] Large-for-gestational age with polyhydramnios on late third-trimester ultrasound is associated with cesarean delivery
    Moss, Heather
    Riley, William L.
    Coonradt, Christiana
    Mastronardi, Alicia
    Brechtel, Leanne
    Maples, Jill
    van Nes, Jaclyn
    Patel, Mithil
    Stewart, Sydney
    Lopez-Schultz, Samson
    Brown, Louis
    Carroll, Landon
    Zite, Nikki B.
    Reeder, Callie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S170 - S170
  • [9] Clinicopathological correlation of large-for-gestational age placenta in pregnancies with pregestational diabetes
    Rais, Rehan
    Starikov, Roman
    Wu, Robert
    Has, Phinnara
    He, Mai
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (03) : 405 - 409
  • [10] Body composition of large-for-gestational age infants.
    Hammami, M
    Walters, J
    Koo, W
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (04) : 1266 - 1266