Remote sensing and the future of landscape ecology

被引:102
|
作者
Newton, Adrian C. [1 ]
Hill, Ross A. [1 ]
Echeverria, Cristian [2 ]
Golicher, Duncan [1 ]
Rey Benayas, Jose M. [3 ]
Cayuela, Luis [3 ,4 ]
Hinsley, Shelley A.
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Conservat Sci, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Univ Concepcion, Fac Ciencias Forestales, Dept Manejo Bosques & Medio Ambiente, Concepcion, Chile
[3] Univ Alcala de Henares, Dept Ecol, Alcala De Henares 28871, Spain
[4] Univ Granada, Dept Ecol, Ctr Andaluz Medio Ambiente, Granada 18006, Spain
来源
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT | 2009年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
biodiversity conservation; ecosystem services; Landsat; spatial dynamics; theory; SPECIES COMPOSITION; CANOPY STRUCTURE; FOREST STRUCTURE; HABITAT QUALITY; TREE DIVERSITY; LAND-COVER; FRAGMENTATION; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1177/0309133309346882
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Landscape ecology focuses on the analysis of spatial pattern and its relationship to ecological processes. As a scientific discipline, landscape ecology has grown rapidly in recent years, supported by developments in GIS and spatial analysis techniques. Although remote sensing data are widely employed in landscape ecology research, their current and potential roles have not been evaluated critically. To provide an overview of current practice, 438 research papers published in the journal Landscape Ecology for the years 2004-2008 were examined for information about use of remote sensing. Results indicated that only 36% of studies explicitly mentioned remote sensing. Of those that did so, aerial photographs and Landsat satellite sensor images were most commonly used, accounting for 46% and 42% of studies, respectively. The predominant application of remote sensing data across these studies was for thematic mapping purposes. This suggests that landscape ecologists have been relatively slow to recognize the potential value of recent developments in remote sensing technologies and methods. The review also provided evidence of a frequent lack of key detail in studies recently published in Landscape Ecology , with 75% failing to provide any assessment of uncertainty or error relating to image classification and mapping. It is suggested that the role of remote sensing in landscape ecology might be strengthened by closer collaboration between researchers in the two disciplines, by greater integration of diverse remote sensing data with ecological data, and by increased recognition of the value of remote sensing beyond land-cover mapping and pattern description. This is illustrated by case studies drawn from Latin America (focusing on forest loss and fragmentation) and the UK (focusing on habitat quality for woodland birds). Such approaches might improve the analytical and theoretical rigour of landscape ecology, and be applied usefully to issues of outstanding societal interest, such as the impacts of environmental change on biodiversity and ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 546
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thermal remote sensing for plant ecology from leaf to globe
    Farella, Martha M.
    Fisher, Joshua B.
    Jiao, Wenzhe
    Key, Kesondra B.
    Barnes, Mallory L.
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2022, 110 (09) : 1996 - 2014
  • [32] Remote sensing and wetland ecology: a South African case study
    De Roeck, Els R.
    Verhoest, Niko E. C.
    Miya, Mtemi H.
    Lievens, Hans
    Batelaan, Okke
    Thomas, Abraham
    Brendonck, Luc
    SENSORS, 2008, 8 (05): : 3542 - 3556
  • [33] Open data and open source for remote sensing training in ecology
    Rocchini, Duccio
    Petras, Vaclav
    Petrasova, Anna
    Horning, Ned
    Furtkevicova, Ludmila
    Neteler, Markus
    Leutner, Benjamin
    Wegmann, Martin
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 40 : 57 - 61
  • [34] Remote sensing of land-cover change and landscape context of the National Parks: A case study of the Northeast Temperate Network
    Wang, Yeqiao
    Mitchell, Brian R.
    Nugranad-Marzilli, Jarunee
    Bonynge, Gregory
    Zhou, Yuyu
    Shriver, Gregory
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 113 (07) : 1453 - 1461
  • [35] Satellite Remote Sensing in Shark and Ray Ecology, Conservation and Management
    Williamson, Michael J.
    Tebbs, Emma J.
    Dawson, Terence P.
    Jacoby, David M. P.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [36] Characterizing Light Pollution Trends across Protected Areas in China Using Nighttime Light Remote Sensing Data
    Jiang, Wei
    He, Guojin
    Leng, Wanchun
    Long, Tengfei
    Wang, Guizhou
    Liu, Huichan
    Peng, Yan
    Yin, Ranyu
    Guo, Hongxiang
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2018, 7 (07)
  • [37] Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2011, 26 (07) : 899 - 909
  • [38] Remote Sensing and Ecosystem Services: Current Status and Future Opportunities for the Study of Bees and Pollination-Related Services
    Galbraith, Sara M.
    Vierling, L. A.
    Bosque-Perez, N. A.
    CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS, 2015, 1 (04): : 261 - 274
  • [39] Remote sensing of structural complexity indices for habitat and species distribution modeling
    Estes, L. D.
    Reillo, P. R.
    Mwangi, A. G.
    Okin, G. S.
    Shugart, H. H.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (04) : 792 - 804
  • [40] Satellite remote sensing of ecosystem functions: opportunities, challenges and way forward
    Pettorelli, Nathalie
    Buehne, Henrike Schulte to
    Tulloch, Ayesha
    Dubois, Gregoire
    Macinnis-Ng, Cate
    Queiros, Ana M.
    Keith, David A.
    Wegmann, Martin
    Schrodt, Franziska
    Stellmes, Marion
    Sonnenschein, Ruth
    Geller, Gary N.
    Roy, Shovonlal
    Somers, Ben
    Murray, Nicholas
    Bland, Lucie
    Geijzendorffer, Ilse
    Kerr, Jeremy T.
    Broszeit, Stefanie
    Leitao, Pedro J.
    Duncan, Clare
    El Serafy, Ghada
    He, Kate S.
    Blanchard, Julia L.
    Lucas, Richard
    Mairota, Paola
    Webb, Thomas J.
    Nicholson, Emily
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 4 (02) : 71 - 93