Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics A randomized crossover manikin trial

被引:16
作者
Gawlowski, Pawel [1 ]
Smereka, Jacek [1 ]
Madziala, Marcin [2 ]
Cohen, Barak [3 ]
Ruetzler, Kurt [3 ]
Szarpak, Lukasz [2 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Emergency Med Serv, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Emergency Med, 4 Lindleya Str, PL-02005 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Cleveland Clin, Inst Anesthesiol, Dept Gen Anesthesiol & Outcomes Res, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
airway management; cervical spine stabilization; vivaSight SL; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; TUBE; GLIDESCOPE(R); PATIENT; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000005873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Management of the airway of a trauma victim is considered challenging. Various approaches have been described to achieve airway control in this setup; many of them include video-assited viewing of the larynx during intubation. ETView Single Lumen (SL) is a novice single-use endotracheal tube equiped with a video camera and a light source at its distal tip. Its use was previously described in seeral clinical and training setups. Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the VivaSight SL compared with classic direct laryngoscopy performed with a Macintosh blade in a manikin-simulated trauma setup presenting various degrees of airway challenge when performed by inexperienced physicians. Design, Setting, Participants: This was prospective, randomized, crossover, manikin trial. After short training on the ETView system, 67 novice paramedics attempted to perform oral intubation using both standard direct laryngoscopy (MAC group) and the VivaSight SL endotracheal tube (ETView group) in a randomized order on manikins in 3 increasingly more difficult scenarios (simple intubation, cervical spine manual stabilization, and with cervical collar in place). Outcome Measure: Overall success rate, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, laryngeal view grade, dental compression, and overall participant satisfaction were monitored. Results: Duration of intubation and number of attempts were significantly superior in the ETView group in the latter 2 more challenging scenarios. All other parameters showed superiority to the ETView group in all 3 scenarios. Conclusion: The VivaSight SL system performed better in a complex scenario of airway management of a trauma victim in need for cervical spine stabilization performed by novice caregivers compared to standard direct laryngoscopy and should be considered in this clinical setup.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for the Emergency Intubation of Trauma Patients
    Michailidou, Maria
    O'Keeffe, Terence
    Mosier, Jarrod M.
    Friese, Randall S.
    Joseph, Bellal
    Rhee, Peter
    Sakles, John C.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 39 (03) : 782 - 788
  • [12] Advanced airway management in an anaesthesiologist-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS): A retrospective analysis of 1047 out-of-hospital intubations
    Piegeler, Tobias
    Neth, Philippe
    Schlaepfer, Martin
    Sulser, Simon
    Albrecht, Roland
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Spahn, Donat R.
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2016, 105 : 66 - 69
  • [13] A Comparison of GlideScope Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy Intubation in the Emergency Department
    Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
    Campagne, Danielle
    Chinnock, Brian
    Snowden, Brandy
    Glickman, Larry T.
    Hendey, Gregory W.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (09) : 866 - 871
  • [14] Ruetzler K, 2015, ANAESTHESIST, V64, P513, DOI 10.1007/s00101-015-0051-5
  • [15] Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices-A manikin study
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    Roessler, Bernhard
    Potura, Lukasz
    Priemayr, Anita
    Robak, Oliver
    Schuster, Ernst
    Frass, Michael
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2011, 82 (05) : 593 - 597
  • [16] TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A COMPARISON OF GLIDESCOPE® VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY TO DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY IN 822 INTUBATIONS
    Sakles, John C.
    Mosier, Jarrod M.
    Chiu, Stephen
    Keim, Samuel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (04) : 400 - 405
  • [17] C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial
    Sulser, Simon
    Ubmann, Dirk
    Schlaepfer, Martin
    Brueesch, Martin
    Goliasch, Georg
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Spahn, Donat R.
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (12) : 943 - 948
  • [18] Can novice physicians intubate with ETView tube without Macintosh laryngoscope? Preliminary data
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Smereka, Jacek
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (11) : 2242 - 2243
  • [19] Are paramedics able to perform endotracheal intubation with access to the patient through the back seat of the car? Randomized crossover manikin study
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Smereka, Jacek
    Evrin, Togay
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (06) : 1161 - 1163
  • [20] Tracheal intubation with a VivaSight-SL endotracheal tube by paramedics in a cervicalimmobilized manikin
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Evrin, Togay
    Bogdanski, Lukasz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (02) : 309 - 310