Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics A randomized crossover manikin trial

被引:16
作者
Gawlowski, Pawel [1 ]
Smereka, Jacek [1 ]
Madziala, Marcin [2 ]
Cohen, Barak [3 ]
Ruetzler, Kurt [3 ]
Szarpak, Lukasz [2 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Emergency Med Serv, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Emergency Med, 4 Lindleya Str, PL-02005 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Cleveland Clin, Inst Anesthesiol, Dept Gen Anesthesiol & Outcomes Res, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
airway management; cervical spine stabilization; vivaSight SL; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; TUBE; GLIDESCOPE(R); PATIENT; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000005873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Management of the airway of a trauma victim is considered challenging. Various approaches have been described to achieve airway control in this setup; many of them include video-assited viewing of the larynx during intubation. ETView Single Lumen (SL) is a novice single-use endotracheal tube equiped with a video camera and a light source at its distal tip. Its use was previously described in seeral clinical and training setups. Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the VivaSight SL compared with classic direct laryngoscopy performed with a Macintosh blade in a manikin-simulated trauma setup presenting various degrees of airway challenge when performed by inexperienced physicians. Design, Setting, Participants: This was prospective, randomized, crossover, manikin trial. After short training on the ETView system, 67 novice paramedics attempted to perform oral intubation using both standard direct laryngoscopy (MAC group) and the VivaSight SL endotracheal tube (ETView group) in a randomized order on manikins in 3 increasingly more difficult scenarios (simple intubation, cervical spine manual stabilization, and with cervical collar in place). Outcome Measure: Overall success rate, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, laryngeal view grade, dental compression, and overall participant satisfaction were monitored. Results: Duration of intubation and number of attempts were significantly superior in the ETView group in the latter 2 more challenging scenarios. All other parameters showed superiority to the ETView group in all 3 scenarios. Conclusion: The VivaSight SL system performed better in a complex scenario of airway management of a trauma victim in need for cervical spine stabilization performed by novice caregivers compared to standard direct laryngoscopy and should be considered in this clinical setup.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Simulated endotracheal intubation of a patient with cervical spine immobilization during resuscitation: a randomized comparison of the Pentax AWS, the Airtraq, and the McCoy Laryngoscopes
    Bogdanski, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Zasko, Piotr
    Adamczyk, Piotr
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (12) : 1814 - 1817
  • [2] Comparison of the C-MAC® and GlideScope® videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine disorders and immobilisation
    Brueck, S.
    Trautner, H.
    Wolff, A.
    Hain, J.
    Mols, G.
    Pakos, P.
    Roewer, N.
    Lange, M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 (02) : 160 - 165
  • [3] DIFFICULT TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN OBSTETRICS
    CORMACK, RS
    LEHANE, J
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (11) : 1105 - 1111
  • [4] A Feasibility Study Using the VivaSight Single Lumen™ to Intubate the Trachea Through the Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Preliminary Report of 50 Cases
    Gaitini, Luis A.
    Yanovski, Boris
    Mustafa, Somri
    Hagberg, Carin A.
    Charco Mora, Pedro
    Vaida, Sonia J.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 (03) : 604 - 608
  • [5] Evaluation of advanced airway management in absolutely inexperienced hands: a randomized manikin trial
    Goliasch, Georg
    Ruetzler, Anita
    Fischer, Henrik
    Frass, Michael
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (05) : 310 - 314
  • [6] Randomized trial comparing the i-gel™ and Magill tracheal tube with the single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal tube for fibreoptic-guided intubation in anaesthetized patients with a predicted difficult airway
    Kleine-Brueggeney, M.
    Theiler, L.
    Urwyler, N.
    Vogt, A.
    Greif, R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (02) : 251 - 257
  • [7] Comparison of intubation times using a manikin with an immobilized cervical spine: Macintosh laryngoscope vs. GlideScope vs. fiberoptic bronchoscope
    Ko, Jung-In
    Ha, Sang Ook
    Koo, Min Seok
    Kwon, Miyoung
    Kim, Jieun
    Jeon, Jin
    Park, So Hee
    Shim, Sangwoo
    Chang, Youjin
    Park, Taejin
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 2 (04): : 244 - 249
  • [8] Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2®, Glidescope®, and Airwayscope® laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization
    Malik, M. A.
    Maharaj, C. H.
    Harte, B. H.
    Laffey, J. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 101 (05) : 723 - 730
  • [9] Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope®, LMA CTrach®, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes
    Malik, M. A.
    Subramaniam, R.
    Churasia, S.
    Maharaj, C. H.
    Harte, B. H.
    Laffey, J. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 102 (05) : 654 - 661
  • [10] Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization
    McElwain, J.
    Laffey, J. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (02) : 258 - 264