Selecting the optimal mining method with extended multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) approach

被引:49
作者
Liang, Weizhang [1 ]
Zhao, Guoyan [1 ]
Hong, Changshou [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ South China, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Hengyang 421001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mining method selection; Extended MULTIMOORA; Improved SWARA; Linguistic neutrosophic numbers; NEW-MODEL; SWARA; AHP; PROJECT; MINE; SET;
D O I
10.1007/s00521-018-3405-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Mining method selection (MMS) is one of the core contents in mining design. As the influencing factors of MMS are in general of ambiguity or uncertainty, MMS can therefore be deemed as a complex fuzzy multi-criteria decision making problem. To resolve this problem, an extended multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) approach is studied in this paper. Three major contributions of this study are included. At first, comparative importance is crisp number in most stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method, while linguistic terms are utilized to determine the criteria weights in the improved SWARA. Then, several Heronian mean (HM) operators related to linguistic neutrosophic numbers (LNNs) are defined to cope with evaluating indicators' interrelations. Special cases are discussed, and primary properties are proved as well. At last, in combination with improved SWARA and HM operators, a novel decision making method, extended MULTIMOORA approach based on LNNs, is proposed. Applying this new approach to selecting the optimal mining method through an example, the feasibility is indicated. In addition, analyses of the strengths of the presented method are performed in comparison with other existing approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:5871 / 5886
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Optimum mining method selection using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process-Qapiliq salt mine, Iran [J].
Hamed, Karimnia ;
Heydar, Bagloo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 25 (02) :225-230
[22]  
Hartman H. L., 2002, Introductory mining engineering
[23]  
Karadogan A, 2008, J S AFR I MIN METALL, V108, P73
[24]  
Kraipeerapun P, 2005, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3802, P1074
[25]   Evaluating Investment Risks of Metallic Mines Using an Extended TOPSIS Method with Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers [J].
Liang, Weizhang ;
Zhao, Guoyan ;
Wu, Hao .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2017, 9 (08)
[26]   Optimization model of unascertained measurement for underground mining method selection and its application [J].
Liu Ai-hua ;
Dong Lei ;
Dong Long-jun .
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) :744-749
[27]   Mining Method Selection and Optimization for Hanging-Wall Ore-Body at Yanqianshan Iron Mine, China [J].
Liu K. ;
Zhu W. ;
Wang Q. ;
Liu X. ;
Liu X. .
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2017, 35 (01) :225-241
[28]   Some neutrosophic uncertain linguistic number Heronian mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making [J].
Liu, Peide ;
Shi, Lanlan .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2017, 28 (05) :1079-1093
[29]   A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments [J].
Mardani, Abbas ;
Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh ;
Zakuan, Norhayati ;
Loganathan, Nanthakumar ;
Soheilirad, Somayeh ;
Saman, Muhamad Zameri Mat ;
Ibrahim, Othman .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 57 :265-292
[30]   Monte Carlo Analytic Hierarchy Process (MAHP) approach to selection of optimum mining method [J].
Mohammad, Ataei ;
Hashem, Shahsavany ;
Reza, Mikaeil .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 23 (04) :573-578