Phylogenetic relationships among species of the neotropical genus Randia (Rubiaceae, Gardenieae) inferred from molecular and morphological data

被引:32
作者
Gustafsson, C [1 ]
Persson, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Bot, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
ITS and 5S of nrDNA; molecular phylogenetics; morphology; Randia; Rubiaceae;
D O I
10.2307/1555021
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Relationships among 38 taxa of Randia (Rubiaceae, Gardenieae) are estimated using nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), the 5S non-transcribed spacer (5S-NTS), and six morphological characters. In addition to Randia, 13 species from eight related genera in Gardenieae (four African, four neotropical) formed the ingroup. Three species from three more distantly related genera in Gardenieae (one African, two neotropical) were chosen as the outgroup. Representatives of the African ingroup genera Calochone, Macrosphyra, Oligocodon and Preussiodora formed a well supported monophyletic group as did the neotropical genera Rosenbergiodendron, Sphinctanthus and Tocoyena. Only when including morphological characters did Randia form a monophyletic group corresponding approximately to contemporary circumscription of the genus, but in this analysis Casasia appears sister to a group of Mexican, Central American, and Antillean Randia. There is no strong jackknife support, however, for either Randia or Casasia to be monophyletic. It is concluded that Randia is comprised of several distinct groups, each with its own geographical distribution. One group of Mexican, Central American, and Antillean Randia, including the type species, can be recognized as Randia in a strict sense. Two other South American groups can be recognized as separate taxa. One of these groups comprises mainly lowland species, and the second is comprised of strictly Andean species.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 674
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae) [J].
Andersson, L ;
Rova, JHE .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 214 (1-4) :161-186
[2]  
Andreasen K, 1996, OPERA BOT BELG, V7, P119
[3]   Combined phylogenetic analysis in the Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae: Morphology, nuclear and chloroplast DNA data [J].
Andreasen, K ;
Bremer, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2000, 87 (11) :1731-1748
[4]  
BORHIDI A, 1981, ACTA BOT HUNG, V27, P21
[5]  
Burger W., 1993, FIELDIANA BOT, V33, P1
[6]   USE OF THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION TO DETECT SPACER SIZE HETEROGENEITY IN PLANT 5S-RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENE CLUSTERS AND TO LOCATE SUCH CLUSTERS IN WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM L) [J].
COX, AV ;
BENNETT, MD ;
DYER, TA .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1992, 83 (6-7) :684-690
[7]   When does the incongruence length difference test fail? [J].
Darlu, P ;
Lecointre, G .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (04) :432-437
[8]  
DeBlock P, 1996, OPERA BOT BELG, V7, P19
[9]  
DECANDOLLE AP, 1830, PRADROMUS SYSTEMATIS
[10]   Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses [J].
Dowton, M ;
Austin, AD .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2002, 51 (01) :19-31