General guidance on exploratory and confirmatory subgroup analysis in late-stage clinical trials

被引:32
作者
Dmitrienko, Alex [1 ]
Muysers, Christoph [2 ]
Fritsch, Arno [3 ]
Lipkovich, Ilya
机构
[1] Quintiles, Ctr Stat Drug Dev, 6700 W 115th St, Overland Pk, KS 66209 USA
[2] Bayer HealthCare, Clin Stat, Berlin, Germany
[3] Bayer HealthCare, Clin Stat, Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
Biomarker evaluation; enrichment designs; regulatory guidance; subgroup analysis; subgroup identification; FRACTIONAL POLYNOMIALS; REGULATORY ISSUES; ADAPTIVE DESIGNS; SELECTION; IDENTIFICATION; CONSISTENCY; BIOMARKERS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2015.1092033
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This article focuses on a broad class of statistical and clinical considerations related to the assessment of treatment effects across patient subgroups in late-stage clinical trials. This article begins with a comprehensive review of clinical trial literature and regulatory guidelines to help define scientifically sound approaches to evaluating subgroup effects in clinical trials. All commonly used types of subgroup analysis are considered in the article, including different variations of prospectively defined and post-hoc subgroup investigations. In the context of confirmatory subgroup analysis, key design and analysis options are presented, which includes conventional and innovative trial designs that support multi-population tailoring approaches. A detailed summary of exploratory subgroup analysis (with the purpose of either consistency assessment or subgroup identification) is also provided. The article promotes a more disciplined approach to post-hoc subgroup identification and formulates key principles that support reliable evaluation of subgroup effects in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 98
页数:28
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL PERSPECTIVES ON SUBGROUP ANALYSIS: TESTING FOR HETEROGENEITY AND EVALUATING ERROR RATE FOR THE COMPLEMENTARY SUBGROUP
    Alosh, Mohamed
    Huque, Mohammad F.
    Koch, Gary G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 25 (06) : 1161 - 1178
  • [2] Multiplicity considerations for subgroup analysis subject to consistency constraint
    Alosh, Mohamed
    Huque, Mohammad F.
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 55 (03) : 444 - 462
  • [3] [Anonymous], EMACHMP5391462013
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, The U.S. Fed Reg
  • [5] A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION
    Berger, James O.
    Wang, Xiaojing
    Shen, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (01) : 110 - 129
  • [6] Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials
    Bonetti, M
    Gelber, RD
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2004, 5 (03) : 465 - 481
  • [7] Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS
  • [8] Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology
    Brannath, Werner
    Zuber, Emmanuel
    Branson, Michael
    Bretz, Frank
    Gallo, Paul
    Posch, Martin
    Racine-Poon, Amy
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (10) : 1445 - 1463
  • [9] Burzykowski T., 2005, EVALUATION SURROGATE
  • [10] Japanese Guideline on Global Clinical Trials: Statistical Implications and Alternative Criteria for Assessing Consistency
    Carroll, Kevin J.
    Le Maulf, Florence
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2011, 45 (05): : 657 - 667