Developing a fully automated evidence synthesis tool for identifying, assessing and collating the evidence

被引:11
作者
Brassey, Jon [1 ]
Price, Christopher [1 ]
Edwards, Jonny [2 ]
Zlabinger, Markus [3 ]
Bampoulidis, Alexandros [3 ,4 ]
Hanbury, Allan [3 ]
机构
[1] Trip Database Ltd, Newport NP20 3PS, Shrops, England
[2] Thoughtful Technol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] TU Wien Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Informat Syst Engn, Vienna, Austria
[4] RSA FG, Res Studio Data Sci, Vienna, Austria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111126
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Evidence synthesis is a key element of evidence-based medicine. However, it is currently hampered by being labour intensive meaning that many trials are not incorporated into robust evidence syntheses and that many are out of date. To overcome this, a variety of techniques are being explored, including using automation technology. Here, we describe a fully automated evidence synthesis system for intervention studies, one that identifies all the relevant evidence, assesses the evidence for reliability and collates it to estimate the relative effectiveness of an intervention. Techniques used include machine learning, natural language processing and rule-based systems. Results are visualised using modern visualisation techniques. We believe this to be the first, publicly available, automated evidence synthesis system: an evidence mapping tool that synthesises evidence on the fly.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 27
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis
[2]   Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? [J].
Bastian, Hilda ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
Chalmers, Iain .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (09)
[3]   Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) [J].
Beller, Elaine ;
Clark, Justin ;
Tsafnat, Guy ;
Adams, Clive ;
Diehl, Heinz ;
Lund, Hans ;
Ouzzani, Mourad ;
Thayer, Kristina ;
Thomas, James ;
Turner, Tari ;
Xia, Jun ;
Robinson, Karen ;
Glasziou, Paul .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
[4]  
Bo Pang, 2008, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, V2, P1, DOI 10.1561/1500000001
[5]  
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, 2014, ASK FOC QUEST
[6]  
Chapman S, 2014, EVIDENTLY COCHRANE
[7]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[8]   Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews [J].
Glasziou, Paul P. ;
Shepperd, Sasha ;
Brassey, Jon .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
[9]   Getting started with meta-analysis [J].
Harrison, Freya .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2011, 2 (01) :1-10
[10]   Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses [J].
Hart, Beth ;
Lundh, Andreas ;
Bero, Lisa .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344