Comparative Physiological and Molecular Analyses of Two Contrasting Flue-Cured Tobacco Genotypes under Progressive Drought Stress

被引:35
|
作者
Su, Xinhong [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Fengjie [1 ,2 ]
Huo, Yongjin [1 ]
Xia, Zongliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Life Sci, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Inst Tobacco Sci, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
obacco; drought; antioxidant enzymes; gene expression; ROS; REAL-TIME PCR; GENE-EXPRESSION; OXIDATIVE STRESS; TOLERANCE; METABOLISM; SALT; PROTEIN; WATER; L; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2017.00827
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Drought is a major environmental factor that limits crop growth and productivity. Flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) is one of the most important commercial crops worldwide and its productivity is vulnerable to drought. However, comparative analyses of physiological, biochemical and gene expression changes in flue-cured tobacco varieties differing in drought tolerance under long-term drought stress are scarce. In this study, drought stress responses of two flue-cured tobacco varieties, LJ851 and JX6007, were comparatively studied at the physiological and transcriptional levels. After exposing to progressive drought stress, the drought-tolerant LJ851 showed less growth inhibition and chlorophyll reduction than the drought-sensitive JX6007. Moreover, higher antioxidant enzyme activities and lower levels of H2O2, Malondialdehyde (MDA), and electrolyte leakage after drought stress were found in LJ851 when compared with JX6007. Further analysis showed that LJ851 plants had much less reductions than the JX6007 in the net photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance during drought stress; indicating that LJ851 had better photosynthetic performance than JX6007 during drought. In addition, transcriptional expression analysis revealed that LJ851 exhibited significantly increased transcripts of several categories of drought-responsive genes in leaves and roots under drought conditions. Together, these results indicated that LJ851 was more drought-tolerant than JX6007 as evidenced by better photosynthetic performance, more powerful antioxidant system, and higher expression of stress defense genes during drought stress. This study will be valuable for the development of novel flue-cured tobacco varieties with improved drought tolerance by exploitation of natural genetic variations in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] Comprehensive physiological analyses and reactive oxygen species profiling in drought tolerant rice genotypes under salinity stress
    Sahana Basu
    Ranjan Kumar Giri
    Ibtesham Benazir
    Santosh Kumar
    Ravi Rajwanshi
    Sharad Kumar Dwivedi
    Gautam Kumar
    Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2017, 23 : 837 - 850
  • [22] Integrated comparative physiological and transcriptomic analyses of Elymus sibiricus L. reveal the similarities and differences in the molecular mechanisms in response to drought and cold stress
    Li, Xinrui
    Chen, Lili
    Li, Daxu
    You, Minghong
    Li, Yingzhu
    Yan, Lijun
    Yan, Jiajun
    Gou, Wenlong
    Chang, Dan
    Ma, Xiao
    Bai, Shiqie
    Peng, Yan
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2025, 219
  • [23] Comprehensive physiological analyses and reactive oxygen species profiling in drought tolerant rice genotypes under salinity stress
    Basu, Sahana
    Giri, Ranjan Kumar
    Benazir, Ibtesham
    Kumar, Santosh
    Rajwanshi, Ravi
    Dwivedi, Sharad Kumar
    Kumar, Gautam
    PHYSIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PLANTS, 2017, 23 (04) : 837 - 850
  • [24] Comparative study of transcriptional and physiological responses to salinity stress in two contrasting Populus alba L. genotypes
    Beritognolo, Isacco
    Harfouche, Antoine
    Brilli, Federico
    Prosperini, Gianluca
    Gaudet, Muriel
    Brosche, Mikael
    Salani, Francesco
    Kuzminsky, Elena
    Auvinen, Petri
    Paulin, Lars
    Kangasjarvi, Jaakko
    Loreto, Francesco
    Valentini, Riccardo
    Mugnozza, Giuseppe Scarascia
    Sabatti, Maurizio
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 31 (12) : 1335 - 1355
  • [25] Stress memory of physiological, biochemical and metabolomic responses in two different rice genotypes under drought stress: The scale matters
    Auler, Priscila Ariane
    Souza, Gustavo Maia
    da Silva Engela, Marcela Regina Goncalves
    do Amaral, Marcelo Nogueira
    Rossatto, Tatiana
    Ziglio da Silva, Maria Gabriella
    Furlan, Claudia Maria
    Maserti, Biancaelena
    Bolacel Braga, Eugenia Jacira
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 311
  • [26] Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Two Contrasting Barley Genotypes under Salinity Stress during the Seedling Stage
    Gao, Runhong
    Duan, Ke
    Guo, Guimei
    Du, Zhizhao
    Chen, Zhiwei
    Li, Liang
    He, Ting
    Lu, Ruiju
    Huang, Jianhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENOMICS, 2013, 2013
  • [27] Comparative physiological analysis in the tolerance to salinity and drought individual and combination in two cotton genotypes with contrasting salt tolerance
    Ibrahim, Wasim
    Qiu, Cheng-Wei
    Zhang, Can
    Cao, Fangbin
    Zhu Shuijin
    Wu, Feibo
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2019, 165 (02) : 155 - 168
  • [28] Comparative physiological and transcriptomic analysis of two contrasting soybean genotypes reveals complex mechanisms involved in drought avoidance
    Li, Shengyou
    Yan, Chunjuan
    Cao, Yongqiang
    Wang, Changling
    Sun, Xugang
    Zhang, Lijun
    Wang, Wenbin
    Song, Shuhong
    CROP SCIENCE, 2024, 64 (02) : 788 - 802
  • [29] The Contribution of Hormonal Changes to the Protective Effect of Endophytic Bacterium Bacillus subtilis on Two Wheat Genotypes with Contrasting Drought Sensitivities under Osmotic Stress
    Lastochkina, Oksana
    Yuldashev, Ruslan
    Avalbaev, Azamat
    Allagulova, Chulpan
    Veselova, Svetlana
    Flores-Felix, Jose David
    Du, Daolin
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [30] Comparative transcriptome combined with morpho-physiological analyses revealed key factors for differential cadmium accumulation in two contrasting sweet sorghum genotypes
    Feng, Juanjuan
    Jia, Weitao
    Lv, Sulian
    Bao, Hexigeduleng
    Miao, Fangfang
    Zhang, Xuan
    Wang, Jinhui
    Li, Jihong
    Li, Dongsheng
    Zhu, Cheng
    Li, Shizhong
    Li, Yinxin
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (02) : 558 - 571