Impact of three task demand factors on simulated unmanned system intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations

被引:13
作者
Abich, Julian [1 ]
Reinerman-Jones, Lauren [1 ]
Matthews, Gerald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Inst Simulat & Training, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Workload; stress; unmanned systems; simulation; signal detection; change detection; change blindness; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; HUMAN-PERFORMANCE; CHANGE-BLINDNESS; TIME-PRESSURE; WORKLOAD; STRESS; VIGILANCE; RESOURCES; FATIGUE; STATE;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2016.1216171
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The present study investigated how three task demand factors influenced performance, subjective workload and stress of novice intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operators within a simulation of an unmanned ground vehicle. Manipulations were task type, dual-tasking and event rate. Participants were required to discriminate human targets within a street scene from a direct video feed (threat detection [TD] task) and detect changes in symbols presented in a map display (change detection [CD] task). Dual-tasking elevated workload and distress, and impaired performance for both tasks. However, with increasing event rate, CD task deteriorated, but TD improved. Thus, standard workload models provide a better guide to evaluating the demands of abstract symbols than to processing realistic human characters. Assessment of stress and workload may be especially important in the design and evaluation of systems in which human character critical signals must be detected in video images.Practitioner Summary: This experiment assessed subjective workload and stress during threat and CD tasks performed alone and in combination. Results indicated an increase in event rate led to significant improvements in performance during TD, but decrements during CD, yet both had associated increases in workload and engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 809
页数:19
相关论文
共 88 条
[71]  
Szalma JL, 2009, HUM FACTORS ERGON, P91
[72]   Individual differences in human-technology interaction: incorporating variation in human characteristics into human factors and ergonomics research and design [J].
Szalma, J. L. .
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2009, 10 (05) :381-397
[73]  
Tasng P.S., 2006, HDB HUMAN FACTORS ER, V3rd, P243, DOI [10.1002/9781118131350.ch8, DOI 10.1002/0470048204.CH9]
[74]   What to Automate: Addressing the Multidimensionality of Cognitive Resources Through System Design [J].
Taylor, Grant S. ;
Reinerman-Jones, Lauren E. ;
Szalma, James L. ;
Mouloua, Mustapha ;
Hancock, Peter A. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 7 (04) :311-329
[75]  
Teo G. W., 2012, P HUM FACT ERG SOC A, V56, P1586, DOI DOI 10.1177/1071181312561316
[76]   Monotony of road environment and driver fatigue: a simulator study [J].
Thiffault, P ;
Bergeron, J .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2003, 35 (03) :381-391
[77]  
Tvaryanas AP, 2006, AVIAT SPACE ENVIR MD, V77, P1278
[78]  
Vicente K.J., 2004, THEOR ISS ERGON SCI, V5, P359, DOI DOI 10.1080/14039220412331298929
[79]   CAUSES OF DISSOCIATION BETWEEN SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD MEASURES AND PERFORMANCE - CAVEATS FOR THE USE OF SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS [J].
VIDULICH, MA ;
WICKENS, CD .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1986, 17 (04) :291-296
[80]   Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful [J].
Warm, Joel S. ;
Parasuraman, Raja ;
Matthews, Gerald .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2008, 50 (03) :433-441