Estimation of the true number of lymph nodes in lymphadenectomy specimens from radical cystectomy

被引:6
作者
Jensen, Jorgen Bjerggaard
Ulhoi, Benedicte Parm
Jensen, Klaus Moller-Ernst
机构
[1] Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby
[2] Institute of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Sygehus, NBG
来源
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2009年 / 43卷 / 04期
关键词
Bladder cancer; cystectomy; lymph node; lymphadenectomy; manual dissection; pathological examination; sensitivity; BLADDER-CANCER; METASTASES; DISSECTION; SEPARATE;
D O I
10.1080/00365590902940245
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective . To evaluate the sensitivity of conventional pathological examination of lymphadenectomy specimens regarding identification of lymph nodes. Material and methods . Fifteen cystectomy specimens with separate package lymphadenectomy specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of the bladder were subjected to conventional pathological examination followed by paraffin embedding and sectioning of all remaining fatty tissue. Identification of additional lymph nodes missed by the initial investigation was registered. Results . In six of the 15 specimens, additional nodes were identified by sectioning of the fatty tissue. Sensitivity per lymph node of the conventional method was 95% (292 of 308 nodes). One patient with multiple metastatic lymph nodes had one additional positive node. No other additional positive nodes were identified in the specimens. Thus no stage migration was seen. Conclusions . Only a minority of lymph nodes are missed by conventional pathological examination of lymphadenectomy specimens from radical cystectomy. The method is therefore sufficient from a staging perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 292
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph node's retrieved in cystectomy specimens [J].
Bochner, BH ;
Herr, HW ;
Reuter, VE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2295-2296
[2]   Efficacy of manual dissection of lymph nodes in colon cancer resections [J].
Brown, HG ;
Luckasevic, TM ;
Medich, DS ;
Celebrezze, JP ;
Jones, SM .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2004, 17 (04) :402-406
[3]  
CANDELA FC, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V66, P1828, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)66:8<1828::AID-CNCR2820660830>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-Z
[5]   CLEARANCE TECHNIQUE FOR THE DETECTION OF LYMPH-NODES IN COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
CAWTHORN, SJ ;
GIBBS, NM ;
MARKS, CG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (01) :58-60
[6]   Pathologic evaluation of radical cystectomy specimens - A cooperative group report [J].
Herr, HW ;
Faulkner, JR ;
Grossman, HB ;
Crawford, ED .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (11) :2470-2475
[7]   Open radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the treatment of choice for invasive bladder cancer [J].
Huang, George J. ;
Stein, John P. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2007, 17 (05) :369-375
[8]   Lymph-node revealing solution: A new method for detecting minute lymph nodes in cystectomy specimens [J].
Koren, R ;
Paz, A ;
Lask, D ;
Kyzer, S ;
Klein, B ;
Schwartz, A ;
Gal, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (01) :40-43
[9]   ADASP recommendations for processing and reporting of lymph node specimens submitted for evaluation of metastatic disease [J].
Lawrence, WD .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 439 (05) :601-603
[10]   PATHO-ANATOMICAL DEMONSTRATION OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN A SURGICAL SPECIMEN [J].
SCHMITZMOORMANN, P ;
THOMAS, C ;
POHL, C ;
SOHL, R .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1982, 174 (04) :403-411