A Screening Tool for Patients With Lumbar Instability

被引:12
作者
Chatprem, Thiwaphon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Puntumetakul, Rungthip [2 ]
Boucaut, Rose [4 ]
Wanpen, Sawitri [2 ]
Chatchawan, Uraiwan [2 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Associated Med Sci, Sch Phys Therapy, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Associated Med Sci, Res Ctr Back Neck Other Joint Pain & Human Perfor, Khon Kaen 4002, Thailand
[3] Univ South Australia, Thailand Res Fund TRF, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ South Australia, Sch Hlth Sci Physiotherapy, Int Ctr Allied Hlth Evidence, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
chronic low back pain; cutoff score; diagnosis; flexion and extension radiograph; gold standard; lumbar instability screening tool; radiological lumbar instability; sensitivity; specificity; x-ray; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SEGMENTAL INSTABILITY; STABILIZING EXERCISE; SPINAL INSTABILITY; SITTING POSTURE; HOUR; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; ACCURACY; FATIGUE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003606
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. The study is a cross-sectional, diagnostic validity study. Objective. The aim of this study was to examine the performance characteristics and validity of an existing lumbar instability questionnaire as a screening tool for lumbar instability among chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Summary of Background Data. Lumbar instability is an initial stage of more severe spinal pathology. Early screening for this condition should help prevent more structural damage. To meet this need, the present study developed numerical cutoff scores for the lumbar instability screening tool. Methods. Lumbar instability screening tool responses and x-ray assessments were reviewed from a sample of 110 patients with CLBP (aged 20-59 years). Receiver operator curves were constructed to optimize sensitivity and specificity of the tool. Results. Fourteen (12.73%) patients had radiological lumbar instability. These patients reported a higher mean lumbar instability questionnaire score than those without radiological lumbar instability. A questionnaire score of at least 7 had sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 100-100) and a specificity of 26.04% (95% CI = 17.84-34.24) for detecting lumbar instability when compared with x-ray examination. Receiver operator curve analysis revealed the lumbar instability screening had an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.47-0.77). Conclusion. A lumbar instability screening tool total score of at least 7 was ruled out lumbar instability in CLBP patients. This cutoff score may be used as a marker of conservative treatment response. The sample size of patients with lumbar instability in this study was small, which may hinder the reliability of the data. Further studies are needed.Y
引用
收藏
页码:E1431 / E1438
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment [J].
Abbott, JH ;
McCane, B ;
Herbison, P ;
Moginie, G ;
Chapple, C ;
Hogarty, T .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2005, 6 (1)
[2]  
Adams MA., 2013, The biomechanics of back pain, V3rd
[3]   New physical examination tests for lumbar spondylolisthesis and instability: low midline sill sign and interspinous gap change during lumbar flexion-extension motion [J].
Ahn, Kang ;
Jhun, Hyung-Joon .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
[4]  
Akkarakittichoke N, 2017, SAF HEALTH WORK-KR, V8, P212
[5]   Clinical Tests to Diagnose Lumbar Segmental Instability: A Systematic Review [J].
Alqarni, Abdullah M. ;
Schneiders, Anthony G. ;
Hendrick, Paul A. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 41 (03) :130-140
[6]  
Biely S., 2006, Orthopaedic Practice, V18, P11
[7]  
Carragee EJ, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V338, P100
[8]  
Chatprem T, J MANIPULATIVE PHYSL
[9]   Subjective and objective descriptors of clinical lumbar spine instability:: A Delphi study [J].
Cook, C ;
Brismée, JM ;
Sizer, PS .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (01) :11-21
[10]  
Costa L, 2016, SPINE PHILA PA 1976, V42, P810