New frontiers in proton therapy: applications in cancers

被引:56
作者
Yuan, Tai-Ze [1 ]
Zhan, Ze-Jiang [2 ]
Qian, Chao-Nan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Concord Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Guangzhou 510045, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Proton therapy; Radiation therapy; Intensity-modulated; Systematic review; Cancer; CELL LUNG-CANCER; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; PHOTON RADIATION-THERAPY; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; BREAST-CANCER; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; DOSE-ESCALATION; NECK CANCERS;
D O I
10.1186/s40880-019-0407-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Proton therapy offers dominant advantages over photon therapy due to the unique depth-dose characteristics of proton, which can cause a dramatic reduction in normal tissue doses both distal and proximal to the tumor target volume. In turn, this feature may allow dose escalation to the tumor target volume while sparing the tumor-neighboring susceptible organs at risk, which has the potential to reduce treatment toxicity and improve local control rate, quality of life and survival. Some dosimetric studies in various cancers have demonstrated the advantages over photon therapy in dose distributions. Further, it has been observed that proton therapy confers to substantial clinical advantage over photon therapy in head and neck, breast, hepatocellular, and non-small cell lung cancers. As such, proton therapy is regarded as the standard modality of radiotherapy in many pediatric cancers from the technical point of view. However, due to the limited clinical evidence, there have been concerns about the high cost of proton therapy from an economic point of view. Considering the treatment expenses for late radiation-induced toxicities, cost-effective analysis in many studies have shown that proton therapy is the most cost-effective option for brain, head and neck and selected breast cancers. Additional studies are warranted to better unveil the cost-effective values of proton therapy and to develop newer ways for better protection of normal tissues. This review aims at reviewing the recent studies on proton therapy to explore its benefits and cost-effectiveness in cancers. We strongly believe that proton therapy will be a common radiotherapy modality for most types of solid cancers in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer [J].
Apinorasethkul, Ontida ;
Kirk, Maura ;
Teo, Kevin ;
Swisher-McClure, Samuel ;
Lukens, John N. ;
Lin, Alexander .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (01) :7-11
[2]   Boron delivery agents for neutron capture therapy of cancer [J].
Barth, Rolf F. ;
Mi, Peng ;
Yang, Weilian .
CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 38 :1-15
[3]   A realistic appraisal of boron neutron capture therapy as a cancer treatment modality [J].
Barth, Rolf F. ;
Zhang, Zizhu ;
Liu, Tong .
CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 38
[4]   Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine [J].
Baumann, Michael ;
Krause, Mechthild ;
Overgaard, Jens ;
Debus, Juergen ;
Bentzen, Soren M. ;
Daartz, Juliane ;
Richter, Christian ;
Zips, Daniel ;
Bortfeld, Thomas .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2016, 16 (04) :234-249
[5]   An in-silico comparison of proton beam and IMRT for postoperative radiotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Berman, Abigail T. ;
Teo, Boon-Keng Kevin ;
Dolney, Derek ;
Swisher-McClure, Samuel ;
Shahnazi, Kambiz ;
Both, Stefan ;
Rengan, Ramesh .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
[6]   Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers [J].
Blanchard, Pierre ;
Gunn, Gary Brandon ;
Lin, Alexander ;
Foote, Robert L. ;
Lee, Nancy Y. ;
Frank, Steven J. .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) :53-63
[7]   Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study [J].
Bradley, Jeffrey D. ;
Paulus, Rebecca ;
Komaki, Ritsuko ;
Masters, Gregory ;
Blumenschein, George ;
Schild, Steven ;
Bogart, Jeffrey ;
Hu, Chen ;
Forster, Kenneth ;
Magliocco, Anthony ;
Kavadi, Vivek ;
Garces, Yolanda I. ;
Narayan, Samir ;
Iyengar, Puneeth ;
Robinson, Cliff ;
Wynn, Raymond B. ;
Koprowski, Christopher ;
Meng, Joanne ;
Beitler, Jonathan ;
Gaur, Rakesh ;
Curran, Walter, Jr. ;
Choy, Hak .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (02) :187-199
[8]   Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Proton Beam Radiation Therapy with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of an Interim Analysis [J].
Bush, David A. ;
Smith, Jason C. ;
Slater, Jerry D. ;
Volk, Michael L. ;
Reeves, Mark E. ;
Cheng, Jason ;
Grove, Roger ;
de Vera, Michael E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01) :477-482
[9]   Proton Beam Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Final Results of a Phase 2 Study [J].
Chang, Joe Y. ;
Verma, Vivek ;
Li, Ming ;
Zhang, Wencheng ;
Komaki, Ritsuko ;
Lu, Charles ;
Allen, Pamela K. ;
Liao, Zhongxing ;
Welsh, James ;
Lin, Steven H. ;
Gomez, Daniel ;
Jeter, Melenda ;
O'Reilly, Michael ;
Zhu, Ronald X. ;
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Li, Heng ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Heymach, John V. ;
Vaporciyan, Ara A. ;
Hahn, Stephen ;
Cox, James D. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2017, 3 (08)
[10]   Clinical Implementation of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies [J].
Chang, Joe Y. ;
Li, Heng ;
Zhu, X. Ronald ;
Liao, Zhongxing ;
Zhao, Lina ;
Liu, Amy ;
Li, Yupeng ;
Sahoo, Narayan ;
Poenisch, Falk ;
Gomez, Daniel R. ;
Wu, Richard ;
Gillin, Michael ;
Zhang, Xiaodong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (04) :809-818