The Simplest Government Heuristic of All: Citizens Infer that Governing Parties are Pro-European Union

被引:2
作者
Adams, James [1 ]
Bernardi, Luca [2 ]
Phillips, M. Christine [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Polit Sci, Davis, CA USA
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Polit, Polit, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Polit, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
European Union; political parties; voters; ELITE INFLUENCE; PUBLIC-OPINION; POLICY; INTEGRATION; MAINSTREAM; RESPONSIVENESS; PERCEPTIONS; STATEMENTS; POSITIONS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1177/0010414020970220
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Previous research documents that citizens apply a "coalition heuristic" to infer that governing coalition partners share more similar policies and ideologies than are implied by the statements in their election manifestos. We propose even simpler government-related heuristics citizens can apply to infer party positions on European integration: the current government heuristic that currently governing parties are more pro-Europe than opposition parties, and the long-term opposition heuristic that opposition parties that have never governed are less pro-Europe than opposition parties with previous governing experience. We report theoretical and empirical analyses of survey data from 24 European Union member states, which substantiate that citizens apply these heuristics, which have consequences for citizens' policy beliefs and their party support. We also find evidence that citizens respond to policy as measured through election manifestos and expert surveys.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1255
页数:29
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Social Welfare Policy Outputs and Governing Parties' Left-Right Images: Do Voters Respond?
    Adams, James
    Bernardi, Luca
    Wlezien, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2020, 82 (03) : 1161 - 1165
  • [2] A problem with empirical studies of party policy shifts: Alternative measures of party shifts are uncorrelated
    Adams, James
    Bernardi, Luca
    Ezrow, Lawrence
    Gordon, Oakley B.
    Liu, Tzu-Ping
    Phillips, M. Christine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (04) : 1234 - 1244
  • [3] The Company You Keep: How Voters Infer Party Positions on European Integration from Governing Coalition Arrangements
    Adams, James
    Ezrow, Lawrence
    Wlezien, Christopher
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 60 (04) : 811 - 823
  • [4] Money Makes the EU Go Round: The Objective Foundations of Conflict in the Council of Ministers
    Bailer, Stefanie
    Mattila, Mikko
    Schneider, Gerald
    [J]. JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2015, 53 (03) : 437 - 456
  • [5] Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010
    Bakker, Ryan
    de Vries, Catherine
    Edwards, Erica
    Hooghe, Liesbet
    Jolly, Seth
    Marks, Gary
    Polk, Jonathan
    Rovny, Jan
    Steenbergen, Marco
    Vachudova, Milada Anna
    [J]. PARTY POLITICS, 2015, 21 (01) : 143 - 152
  • [6] Cinderella and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party systems
    Bale, T
    [J]. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2003, 26 (03) : 67 - 90
  • [7] Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions
    Benoit, Kenneth
    Laver, Michael
    Mikhaylov, Slava
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (02) : 495 - 513
  • [8] Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?
    Bischof, Daniel
    Wagner, Markus
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (04) : 888 - 904
  • [9] Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives
    Boudreau, Cheryl
    MacKenzie, Scott A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 58 (01) : 48 - 62
  • [10] Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate
    Bullock, John G.
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2011, 105 (03) : 496 - 515