Lithofacies identification using multiple adaptive resonance theory neural networks and group decision expert system

被引:67
作者
Chang, HC [1 ]
Kopaska-Merkel, DC
Chen, HC
Durrans, R
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Comp Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Geol Survey Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35486 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
fuzzy rules; pattern recognition; petroleum reservoir characterization; carbonates;
D O I
10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00010-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Lithofacies identification supplies qualitative information about rocks. Lithofacies represent rock textures and an important components of hydrocarbon reservoir description. Traditional techniques of lithofacies identification from core data are costly and different geologists may provide different interpretations. In this paper, we present a low-cost intelligent system consisting of three adaptive resonance theory neural networks and a rule-based expert system to consistently and objectively identify lithofacies from well-log data. The input data are altered into different forms representing different perspectives of observation of lithofacies. Each form of input is processed by a different adaptive resonance theory neural network. Among these three adaptive resonance theory neural networks, one neural network processes the raw continuous data, another processes categorical data, and the third processes fuzzy-set data. Outputs from these three networks are then combined by the expert system using fuzzy inference to determine to which facies the input data should be assigned. Rules are prioritized to emphasize the importance of firing order. This new approach combines the learning ability of neural networks, the adaptability of fuzzy logic, and the expertise of geologists to infer facies of the rocks. This approach is applied to the Appleton Field, an oil held located in Escambia County, Alabama. The hybrid intelligence system data with 87.6% accuracy.predicts lithofacies identity from log of single adaptive resonance theory data, respectively, and by an error. This prediction is more accurate than those networks, 79.3%, 68.0% and 66.0%, using raw, fuzzy-set, and categorical backpropagation neural network, 57.3%. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 601
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Anselmetti FS, 1999, AAPG BULL, V83, P450
[2]  
Baldwin J.L., 1990, The Log Analyst, V3, P279
[3]   NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES VERSUS STATISTICAL-METHODS IN CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISOURCE REMOTE-SENSING DATA [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, JA ;
SWAIN, PH ;
ERSOY, OK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (04) :540-552
[4]  
BIGUS JP, 1996, DATA MINING NEURAL N, P220
[5]  
BLOCH S, 1991, AAPG BULL, V75, P1145
[6]   A FUZZY ARTMAP NONPARAMETRIC PROBABILITY ESTIMATOR FOR NONSTATIONARY PATTERN-RECOGNITION PROBLEMS [J].
CARPENTER, GA ;
GROSSBERG, S ;
REYNOLDS, JH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1995, 6 (06) :1330-1336
[7]   ART-2 - SELF-ORGANIZATION OF STABLE CATEGORY RECOGNITION CODES FOR ANALOG INPUT PATTERNS [J].
CARPENTER, GA ;
GROSSBERG, S .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1987, 26 (23) :4919-4930
[8]  
Chang H.C., 1998, P ART NEUR NETW ENG, P855
[9]  
Chang HC, 1997, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V35, P773
[10]  
CHANG HC, 1999, THESIS U ALABAMA TUS