Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning such a hard sell?

被引:92
作者
Boshier, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
anti-intellectualism; conceptual inadequacy; critical perspective; impediments to SoTL; marginalization; neoliberalism; vagaries of peer review; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1080/07294360802444321
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Advocates have difficulty convincing colleagues Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is a worthwhile use of time and resources. This article highlights problems impeding SoTL. First, scholarship of teaching gets used as a synonym for other activities. Second, Boyer's definition was conceptually confused. Third, SoTL is difficult to operationalize. Fourth, much discourse concerning SoTL is anti-intellectual and located in a narrow neoliberalism. Fifth, there is uncritical over-reliance on peer review as the mechanism for measuring scholarship. Each impediment makes SoTL a hard sell-particularly in research-intensive universities. Taken together, they constitute a formidable problem for SoTL advocates and contain incendiary implications for promotion candidates and committees.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Andreson LeeW., 2000, HIGH EDUC RES DEV, V19, P137
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, P JACKSON FILM MAKER
[3]   The scholarship of teaching and learning: Reconceptualizing scholarship and transforming the academy [J].
Atkinson, MP .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2001, 79 (04) :1217-1229
[4]  
Bender E., 1999, Research and Creative Activity, V22, P1
[5]  
Benjamin J., 2000, HIGH ED RES DEV, V19, P191, DOI DOI 10.1080/072943600445646
[6]  
BERTRAND J, 1985, BORN WIN LIFELONG ST
[7]  
Boyer EL., 1990, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate
[8]  
CAI YP, 1917, COMMUNICATION
[9]  
Campbell J., 1999, RUTHERFORD SCI SUPRE
[10]  
CATTELL R.B., 1957, 16 PERSONALITY FACTO