Public subsidies for R&D and public sector pharmaceutical innovation

被引:12
作者
Kourouklis, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] PSL Univ, MINES ParisTech, Ctr Econ Ind CERNA, Paris, France
[2] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
关键词
Drug Development; public Subsidies; pharmaceutical Innovation; research & Development; public Sector;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2021.1885614
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the relationship between public subsidies for research and development (R&D) and public sector drug development. For the analyses, a novel dataset based on the European clinical trial registry was created, and panel data between 2007 and 2015 originating from twenty-four countries in the European Union were incorporated. For the econometric analysis, I exploit an exogenous shock coming from the Lisbon strategy on innovation policy in Europe to deal with potential endogeneity issues. Two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimates suggest that an increase in public subsidies causes an increase in Phase I clinical trials for nonorphan drugs and also stimulates basic research and Phases I and II of orphan medicinal product clinical trials. These effects are robust, when different time lags and measures of innovation apply, and they are also robust to heteroscedasticity-based instrument estimations. Overall, the results imply that government funding is an important determinant of the pharmaceutical innovation process across different stages and products. Moreover, foreign sources of government funding have a negative impact on the European clinical trials across the examined phases and innovations, while at the same time, the importance of the potential market-size is low.
引用
收藏
页码:3759 / 3777
页数:19
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Market size in innovation: Theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Linn, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (03) :1049-1090
[2]   The dynamics of technological innovation: the case of the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Achilladelis, B ;
Antonakis, N .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (04) :535-588
[3]   Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Dewatripont, Mathias ;
Stein, Jeremy C. .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2008, 39 (03) :617-635
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The Pharmaceutical Industry and Global Health
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GLOBAL FORUM UPDATE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, INN POL UPD UN APPR
[7]   Entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers from the public sector [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Link, Albert N. .
INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 15 (01) :195-208
[8]   Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules [J].
Azoulay, Pierre ;
Zivin, Joshua S. Graff ;
Li, Danielle ;
Sampat, Bhaven N. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01) :117-152
[9]  
Barrenho E., 2018, HLTH ECONOMETRICS CO, V294, P201, DOI [10.1108/S0573-855520180000294010, DOI 10.1108/S0573-855520180000294010]
[10]   Does global drug innovation correspond to burden of disease? The neglected diseases in developed and developing countries [J].
Barrenho, Eliana ;
Miraldo, Marisa ;
Smith, Peter C. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 28 (01) :123-143