Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations

被引:437
作者
Hornsey, MJ [1 ]
Hogg, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_03
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A model of sociostructural relations among subgroups within a superordinate category is presented. Contextualized by discussion of political and social psychological models of intergroup contact, we extend principles of social identity theory to address structural differentiation within groups. Subgroup identity threat plays a pivotal role in the nature of subgroup relations, as do the social realities of specific subgroup relations (i.e., inclusiveness, nested vs. crosscutting categories, leadership, instrumental goal relations, power and status differentials, subgroup similarity). Our analysis suggests that subgroup identity threat is the greatest obstacle to social harmony; social arrangements that threaten social identity produce defensive reactions that result in conflict. Social harmony is best achieved by maintaining, not weakening, subgroup identities, and locating them within the context of a binding superordinate identity.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 156
页数:14
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]   COMMENTS ON THE MOTIVATIONAL STATUS OF SELF-ESTEEM IN SOCIAL IDENTITY AND INTERGROUP DISCRIMINATION [J].
ABRAMS, D ;
HOGG, MA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 18 (04) :317-334
[2]  
Abrams D., 1998, GROUP PROCESS INTERG, V1, P7, DOI DOI 10.1177/1368430298011002
[3]  
Abrams D., 1999, Social identity and social cognition, P1
[4]  
Allport G., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice
[5]  
[Anonymous], CULTURAL DIVIDES UND
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1987, THEORIES INTERGROUP
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SOCIAL PSYCHOL STERE
[8]  
[Anonymous], GROUP MOTIVATION SOC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict
[10]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL IDENTITY SOCI