Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Documented Anterior Uveal Melanoma Regression after Ruthenium-106 Plaque Therapy

被引:0
作者
Elabjer, Biljana Kuzmanovic [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Busic, Mladen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Plese, Andrej [1 ,3 ]
Bjelos, Mirjana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Miletic, Daliborka [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vukojevic, Nenad [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Josip Juraj Strossmayer Osijek, Fac Dent Med & Hlth Care Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
[2] Univ Josip Juraj Strossmayer Osijek, Fac Med Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
[3] Univ Hosp Sveti Duh, WHO Collaborating Ctr, Univ Eye Clin, Sveti Duh 64, HR-1000 Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Univ Hosp Ctr Zagreb, Univ Eye Clin, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
Anterior uveal melanoma; Ultrasound biomicroscopy; Uveal melanoma regression; Brachytherapy; Basal dimension; Tumor prominence; RUTHENIUM BRACHYTHERAPY; GUIDELINES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1159/000512030
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction: Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) is the only widely used method for the evaluation of anterior uveal melanoma (AUM). Objective: Documentation of regression of AUM treated with ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque types CCB and CCC using UBM. Methods: This single institution-based retrospective case series involved 10 Caucasian patients with AUM followed after brachytherapy with UBM from January 2014 until February 2019. The largest prominence of the tumor perpendicular to the sclera or the cornea (including scleral/corneal thickness) (D) and the largest basal dimension (B) were measured in millimeters with UBM for all patients prior to the brachytherapy and at 4-month interval follow-up. Tumor regression was calculated as a percentage of decrease in the initial D and B values. Results: The study involved 10 patients with a mean age of 64.4 years (yr) (range 46-80 yr). D ranged from 1.82 to 5.5 mm (median 2.99 mm) and B from 2.32 to 12.38 mm (median 4.18 mm). The apical radiation dose in all patients was 100 Gy. The median follow-up was 42.02 months. Regression for D was 21.11 +/- 13.66%, 31.09 +/- 14.66%, and 34.92 +/- 19.86% at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year of the follow-up, respectively, while for B it was 21.58 +/- 16.05%, 28.98 +/- 17.71%, and 32.06 +/- 18.96%, respectively. Tumor recurrence was documented in 2/10 patients. Conclusion: The major regression of AUM, treated with Ru-106 plaque types CCB and CCC, was documented in the first 2 years after brachytherapy in our study group. In the following years, only minimal regression was documented that warns of the need for close monitoring and active search for local recurrences.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ABRAMSON D, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V74, P359
[2]   106Ru plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: Factors associated with local tumor recurrence [J].
Barker, Christopher A. ;
Francis, Jasmine H. ;
Cohen, Gil'ad N. ;
Marr, Brian P. ;
Wolden, Suzanne L. ;
McCormick, Beryl ;
Abramson, David H. .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2014, 13 (06) :584-590
[3]   Brachytherapy for patients with uveal melanoma: historical perspectives and future treatment directions [J].
Brewington, Beatrice Y. ;
Shao, Yusra F. ;
Davidorf, Fredrick H. ;
Cebulla, Colleen M. .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 12 :925-934
[4]  
Costache Mariana, 2013, Maedica (Bucur), V8, P360
[5]   Local tumor control after 106Ru brachytherapy of choroidal melanoma [J].
Damato, B ;
Patel, I ;
Campbell, IR ;
Mayles, HM ;
Errington, RD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02) :385-391
[6]  
Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG , RU 106 EYE APPLICATO
[7]   Scleral Thinning Documented by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy after Plaque Therapy for Anterior Ciliary Melanoma [J].
Elabjer, B. Kuzmanovic ;
Busic, M. ;
Miletic, D. ;
Bjelos, M. ;
Vukojevic, N. ;
Bosnar, D. .
SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 33 (04) :571-575
[8]  
ELABJER BK, INT J OPHTHALMOL-CHI, V13, P681
[9]   Is Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) still relevant? [J].
Honavar, Santosh G. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 66 (10) :1385-1387
[10]  
Hyrcza, UVEA PATHOLOGIC TNM