EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search

被引:32
作者
Brouwer, Anne-Marie [1 ]
Hogervorst, Maarten A. [1 ]
Oudejans, Bob [1 ]
Ries, Anthony J. [2 ]
Touryan, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res TNO, Perceptual & Cognit Syst, Soesterberg, Netherlands
[2] US Army Res Lab, Aberdeen, MD USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2017年 / 11卷
关键词
EEG; pupil size; fixation; SRP; FRP; visual search; target detection; BCI; FIXATION-RELATED POTENTIALS; TASK; MEMORY; ATTENTION; PARADIGM; WORKLOAD; LOAD;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2017.00264
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
EEG and eye tracking variables are potential sources of information about the underlying processes of target detection and storage during visual search. Fixation duration, pupil size and event related potentials (ERPs) locked to the onset of fixation or saccade (saccade-related potentials, SRPs) have been reported to differ dependent on whether a target or a non-target is currently fixated. Here we focus on the question of whether these variables also differ between targets that are subsequently reported (hits) and targets that are not (misses). Observers were asked to scan 15 locations that were consecutively highlighted for 1 s in pseudo-random order. Highlighted locations displayed either a target or a non-target stimulus with two, three or four targets per trial. After scanning, participants indicated which locations had displayed a target. To induce memory encoding failures, participants concurrently performed an aurally presented math task (high load condition). In a low load condition, participants ignored the math task. As expected, more targets were missed in the high compared with the low load condition. For both conditions, eye tracking features distinguished better between hits and misses than between targets and non-targets (with larger pupil size and shorter fixations for missed compared with correctly encoded targets). In contrast, SRP features distinguished better between targets and non-targets than between hits and misses (with average SRPs showing larger P300 waveforms for targets than for non-targets). Single trial classification results were consistent with these averages. This work suggests complementary contributions of eye and EEG measures in potential applications to support search and detect tasks. SRPs may be useful to monitor what objects are relevant to an observer, and eye variables may indicate whether the observer should be reminded of them later.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm
    Allison, Brendan Z.
    Polich, John
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 77 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [2] Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from event-related potentials
    Azizian, Aflen
    Polich, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 19 (12) : 2071 - 2081
  • [3] TASK-EVOKED PUPILLARY RESPONSES, PROCESSING LOAD, AND THE STRUCTURE OF PROCESSING RESOURCES
    BEATTY, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) : 276 - 292
  • [4] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300
  • [5] Brouwer A.-M., 2014, P 6 INT BRAIN COMP I
  • [6] Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state: six recommendations to avoid common pitfalls
    Brouwer, Anne-Marie
    Zander, Thorsten O.
    van Erp, Janb. F.
    Korteling, Johannes E.
    Bronkhorst, Adelbert W.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [7] Distinguishing between target and nontarget fixations in a visual search task using fixation-related potentials
    Brouwer, Anne-Marie
    Reuderink, Boris
    Vincent, Joris
    van Gerven, Marcel A. J.
    van Erp, Jan B. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03): : 17
  • [8] The Fixation and Saccade P3
    Dandekar, Sangita
    Ding, Jian
    Privitera, Claudio
    Carney, Thom
    Klein, Stanley A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [9] Neural saccadic response estimation during natural viewing
    Dandekar, Sangita
    Privitera, Claudio
    Carney, Thom
    Klein, Stanley A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 107 (06) : 1776 - 1790
  • [10] EEG precursors of detected and missed targets during free-viewing search
    Dias, Joao C.
    Sajda, Paul
    Dmochowski, Jacek P.
    Parra, Lucas C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (13):