Systematic Reviews of Clinical Benefits of Exoskeleton Use for Gait and Mobility in Neurologic Disorders: A Tertiary Study

被引:30
作者
Dijkers, Marcel P. [1 ]
Akers, Katherine G. [2 ]
Dieffenbach, Sabrina [3 ]
Galen, Sujay S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Shiffman Med Lib, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Phys Therapy Program, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 102卷 / 02期
关键词
Exoskeleton device; Nervous system diseases; Patient outcome assessment; Rehabilitation; Review; Review literature as topic; Spinal cord injuries; Stroke; Treatment outcome; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; POWERED ROBOTIC EXOSKELETONS; DUPLICATE PUBLICATION; REHABILITATION; WALKING; USABILITY; SAFETY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.025
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe systematic reviews (SRs) of the use of exoskeletons for gait and mobility by persons with neurologic disorders and to evaluate their quality as guidance for research and clinical practice. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PEDro, and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to January 23, 2018. Study Selection: A total of 331 deduplicated abstracts from bibliographic database and ancestor searching were independently screened by 2 reviewers, resulting in 109 articles for which full text was obtained. Independent screening of those 109 articles by 2 reviewers resulted in a final selection of 17 SRs. Data Extraction: Data were extracted by 1 reviewer using a pretested Excel form with 158 fields and checked by a second reviewer. Key data included the purpose of the SR, methods used, outcome measures presented, and conclusions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2 were used to evaluate reporting and methodological quality, respectively, of the SRs. Data Synthesis: The SRs generally were of poor methodological and reporting quality. They failed to report some information on patients (eg, height, weight, baseline ambulatory status) and interventions (eg, treatment hours or sessions planned and delivered) that clinicians and other stakeholders might want to have, and often failed to notice that the primary studies duplicated subjects. Conclusions: Published SRs on exoskeletons have many weaknesses in design and execution; clinicians, researchers, and other stakeholders should be cautious in relying on them to make decisions on the use of this technology. Future primary and secondary studies need to address the multiple methodological limitations. (C) 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 313
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The influence of orthosis options on walking parameters in spinal cord-injured patients: a literature review [J].
Arazpour, M. ;
Samadian, M. ;
Ebrahimzadeh, K. ;
Bani, M. Ahmadi ;
Hutchins, S. W. .
SPINAL CORD, 2016, 54 (06) :412-422
[2]   The efficacy of powered orthoses on walking in persons with paraplegia [J].
Arazpour, Mokhtar ;
Hutchins, Stephen William ;
Bani, Monireh Ahmadi .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 39 (02) :90-99
[3]   Reciprocal gait orthoses and powered gait orthoses for walking by spinal cord injury patients [J].
Arazpour, Mokhtar ;
Bani, Monireh Ahmadi ;
Hutchins, Stephen W. .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 37 (01) :14-21
[4]   Framework for Assessment of the Usability of Lower-Extremity Robotic Exoskeletal Orthoses [J].
Bryce, Thomas N. ;
Dijkers, Marcel P. ;
Kozlowski, Allan J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2015, 94 (11) :1000-1014
[5]  
Chamorro-Moriana G, 2018, SENSORS BASEL, P181
[6]   Powered exoskeletons for bipedal locomotion after spinal cord injury [J].
Contreras-Vidal, Jose L. ;
Bhagat, Nikunj A. ;
Brantley, Justin ;
Cruz-Garza, Jesus G. ;
He, Yongtian ;
Manley, Quinn ;
Nakagome, Sho ;
Nathan, Kevin ;
Tan, Su H. ;
Zhu, Fangshi ;
Pons, Jose L. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (03)
[7]   Letter to the editor regarding "Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis" [J].
Dijkers, Marcel P. ;
Akers, Katherine G. ;
Galen, Sujay S. ;
Patzer, Diane E. ;
Vu, Phuong T. .
MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2016, 9 :419-420
[8]   The effectiveness of powered, active lower limb exoskeletons in neurorehabilitation: A systematic review [J].
Federici, Stefano ;
Meloni, Fabio ;
Bracalenti, Marco ;
De Filippis, Maria Laura .
NEUROREHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (03) :321-340
[9]   The Effectiveness and Safety of Exoskeletons as Assistive and Rehabilitation Devices in the Treatment of Neurologic Gait Disorders in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review [J].
Fisahn, Christian ;
Aach, Mirko ;
Jansen, Oliver ;
Moisi, Marc ;
Mayadev, Angeli ;
Pagarigan, Krystle T. ;
Dettori, Joseph R. ;
Schildhauer, Thomas A. .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (08) :822-841
[10]  
Haarman JA, J REHABIL ASSIST TER, V3