Institutional Marfan syndrome surgical volume influences mitral valve surgical strategy in patients with Marfan syndrome

Background/Aim The goal of this study was to evaluate trends in mitral valve (MV) operations performed on patients with Marfan syndrome (MfS) and determine the influence of an institution's MfS and MV surgical volume on MV surgical strategy in the US. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 1998 to 2011 and a total of 1126 patients with MfS were identified who underwent MV operations meeting our inclusion criteria. Linear regression was performed to assess trends of MV repair (MVr) rates over time. Patients were stratified into tertiles depending on the institution's annual MfS and MV surgical volumes. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the impact of institutional MV and MfS surgical volume on whether a patient received an MV replacement (MVR). Results The MVR rate was 60% for the entire cohort. There was a decreasing trend of MVR rates during the study period (82% in 1998-99 vs 49% in 2010-2011, P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients operated on at high (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; P < .05) and medium (OR, 0.66; P < .05) volume MfS centers were less likely to undergo MVR when compared to lower-volume MfS centers. In contrast, MV volume was not a significant predictor of surgical strategy in this cohort. Conclusion The national MVR rate in the MfS population is higher than published reports. Data from this study suggest that MfS patients with indications for MV surgery should be referred to high-volume MfS surgical centers to have the best opportunity for MVr.