What is the treatment effect of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at 1-year follow-up?

被引:13
作者
Held, Ulrike [1 ,2 ]
Steurer, Johann [1 ]
Pichierri, Giuseppe [1 ]
Wertli, Maria M. [1 ,3 ]
Farshad, Mazda [4 ]
Brunner, Florian [5 ]
Guggenberger, Roman [6 ]
Porchet, Francois [7 ]
Fekete, Tamas F. [7 ]
Schmid, Urs D. [8 ]
Gravestock, Isaac [1 ]
Burgstaller, Jakob M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr Patient Oriented Res & Knowledge Trans, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Biostat, Epidemiol Biostat & Prevent Inst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Bern Univ, Bern Univ Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Balgrist Univ Hosp, Spine Div, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rheumatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Schulthess Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg & Neurosurg, Spine Unit, Zurich, Switzerland
[8] Stadtspital Triemli, Dept Neurosurg, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; surgery; propensity score; matching; confounding; sensitivity analysis; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; PREOPERATIVE PREDICTORS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; DECOMPRESSION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3171/2019.1.SPINE181098
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to obtain an unbiased causal treatment estimate of the between-group difference of surgery versus nonoperative treatment with respect to outcomes on quality of life, pain, and disability in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) 12 months after baseline. METHODS The authors included DLSS patients from a large prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Propensity score matching was used, including 15 demographic, clinical, and MRI variables. Linear and logistic mixed-effects regression models were applied to quantify the between-group treatment effect. Unmeasured confounding was addressed in a sensitivity analysis, assessing the robustness of the results. RESULTS A total of 408 patients were included in this study, 222 patients after matching, with 111 in each treatment group. Patients with nonoperative treatment had lower quality of life at the 12-month follow-up (-6.21 points, 95% CI -9.93 to -2.49) as well as lower chances of reaching a minimal clinically important difference in Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) symptoms (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.53) and SSM function (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.49), than patients undergoing surgery. These results were very robust in case of unmeasured confounding. The surgical complication rate was low; 5 (4.5%) patients experienced a durotomy during intervention, and 5 (4.5%) patients underwent re-decompression. CONCLUSIONS The authors used propensity score matching to assess the difference in treatment efficacy of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment in elderly patients with DLSS. This study delivers strong evidence that surgical treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment. It helps in clinical decision-making, especially when patients suffer for a long time, sometimes over many years, hoping for a spontaneous improvement of their symptoms. In light of these new results, the number of years with disability can hopefully be reduced by providing adequate treatment at the right time for this ever-growing elderly and frail population.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Bounding a matching estimator: the case of a Norwegian training program [J].
Aakvik, A .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 63 (01) :115-143
[2]   PREOPERATIVE PREDICTORS FOR GOOD POSTOPERATIVE SATISFACTION AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME IN LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY WITH A TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
Aalto, T. ;
Sinikallio, S. ;
Kroger, H. ;
Viinamaki, H. ;
Herno, A. ;
Leinonen, V. ;
Turunen, V. ;
Savolainen, S. ;
Airaksinen, O. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 101 (04) :255-260
[3]   Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis -: Systematic review [J].
Aalto, Timo J. ;
Malmivaara, Antti ;
Kovacs, Francisco ;
Herno, Arto ;
Alen, Markku ;
Salmi, Liisa ;
Kroger, Heikki ;
Andrade, Juan ;
Jimenez, Rosa ;
Tapaninaho, Antti ;
Turunen, Veli ;
Savolainen, Sakari ;
Airaksinen, Olavi .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (18) :E648-E663
[4]   Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study [J].
Abraha, Iosief ;
Cherubini, Antonio ;
Cozzolino, Francesco ;
De Florio, Rita ;
Luchetta, Maria Laura ;
Rimland, Joseph M. ;
Folletti, Ilenia ;
Marchesi, Mauro ;
Germani, Antonella ;
Orso, Massimiliano ;
Eusebi, Paolo ;
Montedori, Alessandro .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
[5]   Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Athiviraham, Aravind ;
Wali, Zubair A. ;
Yen, David .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (07) :613-617
[6]   The Maine Lumbar Spine Study .3. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Keller, RB ;
Chapin, AM ;
Patrick, DL ;
Long, JM ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1787-1794
[7]   Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Wu, YA ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) :936-943
[8]  
Austin PC, 2008, STAT MED, V27, P2037, DOI 10.1002/sim.3150
[9]   The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis [J].
Benoist, M .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2002, 69 (05) :450-457
[10]   Variable selection for propensity score models [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Schneeweiss, Sebastian ;
Rothman, Kenneth J. ;
Glynn, Robert J. ;
Avorn, Jerry ;
Sturmer, Til .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 163 (12) :1149-1156