Privatized utilities and the 'third way'

被引:4
作者
Jones, A
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9302.00220
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The Government is planning new regulations to ensure that utility companies 'reflect a sense of social responsibility'. Their intention to overlay social objectives on the regulatory frameworks inspired by free market economics can be seen as an attempt to find a 'Third Way' policy for the utilities. Neoliberals would argue that social policy has no place in the privatized utility sector, which is now well established. Inteference in regulatory processes to achieve social objectives is likely to be counter-productive by distorting prices and inhibiting the incentive system designed to achieve efficiencies. Rather than requiring the companies to act as instruments of government policy, the Government could achieve its social objectives through subsidies, or through the social security system, leaving the regulatory frame work to operate unfettered.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 109 I EC AFF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, FAIR DEAL CONS MOD F
[4]  
Ansoff H.I., 1965, CORPORATE STRATEGY
[5]  
Armstrong M., 1994, Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British experience
[6]  
BATTLE J, 1999, PARLIAMENTARY QUESTI
[7]  
BRIGLEY S, 1997, CURRENT ISSUES BUSIN
[8]  
BUCKLEY C, 2000, TIMES 0117
[9]   The competitive order or ordered competition?: The 'UK model' or utility regulation in theory and practice [J].
Burton, J .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1997, 75 (02) :157-188
[10]   Incentive regulation in the United Kingdom and the United States: Some lessons [J].
Crew, MA ;
Kleindorfer, PR .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (03) :211-225