Multicenter investigation comparing a highly efficient half-time stress-only attenuation correction approach against standard rest-stress Tc-99m SPECT imaging

被引:57
|
作者
Bateman, Timothy M. [1 ,2 ]
Heller, Gary V. [3 ]
McGhie, A. Iain [1 ]
Courter, Staci A. [2 ]
Golub, Robert A. [4 ]
Case, James A. [2 ]
Cullom, S. James [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Mid Amer Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[2] Cardiovasc Imaging Technol, Kansas City, MO USA
[3] Hartford Hosp, Hartford, CT 06115 USA
[4] Cardiol Associates Cent Connecticut, Wallingford, CT USA
关键词
Radionuclides; single photon emission computed tomography; myocardial perfusion imaging; attenuation correction; stress testing; coronary artery disease; MYOCARDIAL-PERFUSION SPECT; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; CARDIOLOGY; NUCLEAR; SCAN; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-009-9109-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
New iterative algorithms for scatter compensation (SC), noise suppression, and depth-dependent collimator resolution (RR) can shorten rest and stress SPECT acquisitions by 50% while maintaining quality and accuracy equivalent to conventional scans. Full-time stress-only myocardial perfusion SPECT is accurate and efficient when combined with line-source attenuation correction (LSAC). We investigated the potential for half-time stress-only LSAC-SPECT by comparing this to conventional rest/stress SPECT in patients imaged for suspected CAD at three different centers. One hundred and ten patients (58% men, 53% exercise) had 64 projection rest/stress Tc-99m ECG-gated SPECT with simultaneous Gd-153 LSAC: 18 had a parts per thousand currency sign5% CAD likelihood and 92 had coronary angiography. The stress scans were retrospectively 'stripped' to create equally spaced 32 projection "half-time" (HT) scans for the emission and transmission (TX) projections. Astonish (Philips, Milpitas, CA) processing with AC, SC, and RR was applied to the HT data with the HT TX maps reconstructed using a Bayesian iterative method. The conventional rest/stress image sets processed using filtered back projection and without AC and the HT-AC stress-only images were interpreted in random sequence by consensus of two readers blinded to clinical information in separate reading sessions. Comparing rest/stress FBP and HT-LSAC, stress perfusion quality was excellent/good in 82 and 89% (P = .13); interpretive certainty (definitely normal or abnormal) was 88 and 95% (P = .14); sensitivity was 77 and 83% (P = .38); specificity was 67 and 71% (P = .65); normalcy was 94 and 100% (P = 1.0); SSS for CAD pts was 7.4 vs 7.8 and for non-CAD pts was 0.7 vs 0 (P = .44 and .16, respectively). Mean stress LVEF was 60% in both groups. Stress-only imaging with HT-LSAC using the Astonish acquisition/processing method provides results equivalent to conventional rest/stress scanning. This new approach has the potential to significantly improve operational efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 735
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Multicenter investigation comparing a highly efficient half-time stress-only attenuation correction approach against standard rest-stress Tc-99m SPECT imaging
    Timothy M. Bateman
    Gary V. Heller
    A. Iain McGhie
    Staci A. Courter
    Robert A. Golub
    James A. Case
    S. James Cullom
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2009, 16 : 726 - 735
  • [2] Clinical value of stress-only Tc-99m SPECT imaging: Importance of attenuation correction
    Mathur, Shishir
    Heller, Gary V.
    Bateman, Timothy M.
    Ruffin, Richard
    Yekta, Arshad
    Katten, Deborah
    Alluri, Nitya
    Ahlberg, Alan W.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [3] Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging
    Heller, GV
    Bateman, TM
    Johnson, LL
    Cullom, SJ
    Case, JA
    Galt, JR
    Garcia, EV
    Haddock, K
    Moutray, KL
    Poston, C
    Botvinick, EH
    Fish, MB
    Follansbee, WP
    Hayes, S
    Iskandrian, AE
    Mahmarian, JJ
    Vandecker, W
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (03) : 273 - 281
  • [4] Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging
    Gary V. Heller
    Timothy M. Bateman
    Lynne L. Johnson
    S. James Cullom
    James A. Case
    James R. Galt
    Ernest V. Garcia
    Keith Haddock
    Kelly L. Moutray
    Carlos Poston
    Eli H. Botvinick
    Matthews B. Fish
    William P. Follansbee
    Sean Hayes
    Ami E. Iskandrian
    John J. Mahmarian
    William Vandecker
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2004, 11 : 273 - 281
  • [5] Clinical value of stress-only Tc-99m SPECT imaging: Importance of attenuation correction
    Shishir Mathur
    Gary V. Heller
    Timothy M. Bateman
    Richard Ruffin
    Arshad Yekta
    Deborah Katten
    Nitya Alluri
    Alan W. Ahlberg
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2013, 20 : 27 - 37
  • [6] Risk stratification using line source attenuation correction with rest/stress Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
    Ardestani, Afrooz
    Ahlberg, Alan W.
    Katten, Deborah M.
    Santilli, Krista
    Polk, Donna M.
    Bateman, Timothy M.
    Heller, Gary V.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (01) : 118 - 126
  • [7] CT-based attenuation correction versus prone imaging to decrease equivocal interpretations of rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT MPI
    Dee Malkerneker
    Reuven Brenner
    William H. Martin
    Uchechukwu K. A. Sampson
    Irene D. Feurer
    Marvin W. Kronenberg
    Dominique Delbeke
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2007, 14 : 314 - 323
  • [8] CT-based attenuation correction versus prone imaging to decrease equivocal interpretations of rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT MPI
    Malkerneker, Dee
    Brenner, Reuven
    Martin, William H.
    Sampson, Uchechukwu K. A.
    Feurer, Irene D.
    Kronenberg, Marvin W.
    Delbeke, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (03) : 314 - 323
  • [9] Risk stratification using line source attenuation correction with rest/stress Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
    Afrooz Ardestani
    Alan W. Ahlberg
    Deborah M. Katten
    Krista Santilli
    Donna M. Polk
    Timothy M. Bateman
    Gary V. Heller
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2014, 21 : 118 - 126