The Differential Effects of Anger on Trust: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effects of Gender and Social Distance

被引:8
作者
Zhang, Keshun [1 ,2 ]
Goetz, Thomas [3 ]
Chen, Fadong [4 ]
Sverdlik, Anna [5 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Qingdao Psychol & Mental Hlth Res Inst, Dept Psychol, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Konstanz, Grad Sch Decis Sci, Constance, Germany
[3] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Dev & Educ Psychol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Management, Neuromanagement Lab, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
trust; anger; gender; social distance; cross-cultural; SEX-DIFFERENCES; UNITED-STATES; EMOTION; APPRAISAL; JUDGMENT; SHAME; INDIVIDUALISM; AFFORDANCES; RECIPROCITY; ASSUMPTIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597436
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Accumulating empirical evidence suggests that anger elicited in one situation can influence trust behaviors in another situation. However, the conditions under which anger influences trust are still unclear. The present study addresses this research gap and examines the ways in which anger influences trust. We hypothesized that the social distance to the trustee, and the trusting person's gender would moderate the effect of anger on trust. To test this hypothesis, a study using a 2 (Anger vs. Control) x 2 (Low vs. High social distance) x 2 (Men vs. Women) factorial design was conducted in Germany (N = 215) and in China (N = 310). Results reveal that in both countries men's trust behavior was not influenced by the manipulations (i.e., anger and social distance). The pattern for women, however, differed by country. In Germany, women's trust to a stranger (i.e., high social distance) was increased by anger; while in China, women's trust to someone who they have communicated with (i.e., low social distance) was increased by anger. These results indicate that women's trust levels seem to be more context-sensitive than men's.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[2]   Social distance and social decisions [J].
Akerlof, GA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1997, 65 (05) :1005-1027
[3]  
Algan Y., 2013, Handbook of Economic Growth
[4]   Sex Differences in Task and Social-Emotional Behavior [J].
Anderson, Lynn R. ;
Blanchard, P. Nick .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 3 (02) :109-139
[5]   Anger is associated with reward-related electrocortical activity: Evidence from the reward positivity [J].
Angus, Douglas J. ;
Kemkes, Kevin ;
Schutter, Dennis J. L. G. ;
Harmon-Jones, Eddie .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 52 (10) :1271-1280
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1974, DIFFERENTIAL E UNPUB
[7]   INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
SMOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :596-612
[8]   Spillover Effects of Loss of Control on Risky Decision-Making [J].
Beisswingert, Birgit M. ;
Zhang, Keshun ;
Goetz, Thomas ;
Fischbacher, Urs .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03)
[9]   The effects of subjective loss of control on risk-taking behavior: the mediating role of anger [J].
Beisswingert, Birgit M. ;
Zhang, Keshun ;
Goetz, Thomas ;
Fang, Ping ;
Fischbacher, Urs .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
[10]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142