Ambient lighting: Effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist

被引:105
作者
Brennan, Patrick C.
McEntee, Mark
Evanoff, Michael
Phillips, Peter
O'Connor, William T.
Manning, David J.
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Med & Med Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
[2] Amer Board Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85711 USA
[3] St Martins Coll, Sch Med Imaging Sci, Lancaster LA1 3JD, England
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Conway Inst, Appl Neurotherapeut Res Grp, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
lighting; PACS; wrist; X-ray technology;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2048
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The aim of the work was to establish optimum ambient light conditions for viewing radiologic images of the wrist on liquid crystal display monitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Five ambient light levels were investigated: 480, 100, 40, 25, and 7 lux. Seventy-nine experienced radiologists were asked to examine 30 posteroanterior wrist images and decide whether a fracture was present. All images were displayed on liquid crystal display monitors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the numbers of false-positive and false-negative findings were recorded. RESULTS. For all the radiologists, greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and lower numbers of false-positive and false-negative findings were recorded at 40 and 25 lux compared with 480 and 100 lux. At 7 lux, the results were generally similar to those at 480 and 100 lux. The experience and knowledge of radiologists specializing in imaging of musculoskeletal trauma appeared to compensate in part for inappropriate lighting levels. CONCLUSION. Typical office lighting and current recommendations on ambient lighting can reduce diagnostic efficacy compared with lower levels of ambient lighting. If, however, no light other than that of the monitor is used, results are similar to those with excessive levels of lighting. Careful control of ambient lighting is therefore required to ensure that diagnostic accuracy is maximized, particularly for clinicians not expert in interpreting posteroanterior wrist images.
引用
收藏
页码:W177 / W180
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*AM COLL RAD, 2001, PRACT GUID TECHN STA
[2]  
BALTER S, 2005, P SPIE MED IM INT S, P209
[3]   Image presentation in digital radiology: Perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application [J].
Blume, H ;
Hemminger, BM .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1997, 17 (03) :769-777
[4]  
*CEC, 1997, RAD PROT
[5]   Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside [J].
Fuchsjäger, MH ;
Schaefer-Prokop, CM ;
Eisenhuber, E ;
Homolka, P ;
Weber, M ;
Funovics, MA ;
Prokop, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (05) :1415-1421
[6]   Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs [J].
Goo, JM ;
Choi, AY ;
Im, JG ;
Lee, HL ;
Chung, MJ ;
Han, DH ;
Park, SH ;
Kim, JH ;
Nam, SH .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :762-766
[7]   Viewing conditions for diagnostic images in three major Dublin hospitals: a comparison with WHO and CEC recommendations [J].
McCarthy, E ;
Brennan, PC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 76 (902) :94-97
[8]  
Roehrig H, 1990, J Digit Imaging, V3, P134
[9]   Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: Executive summary of AAPM TG18 report [J].
Samei, E ;
Badano, A ;
Chakraborty, D ;
Compton, K ;
Cornelius, C ;
Corrigan, K ;
Flynn, MJ ;
Hemminger, B ;
Hangiandreou, N ;
Johnson, J ;
Moxley-Stevens, DM ;
Pavlicek, W ;
Roehrig, H ;
Rutz, L ;
Samei, E ;
Shepard, J ;
Uzenoff, RA ;
Wang, JH ;
Willis, CE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (04) :1205-1225
[10]   Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs:: Comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors [J].
Scharitzer, M ;
Prokop, M ;
Weber, M ;
Fuchsjäger, M ;
Oschatz, E ;
Schaefer-Prokop, C .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) :611-616