Mapping potentials and challenges of choice modelling for social science research

被引:15
作者
Liebe, Ulf [1 ]
Meyerhoff, Juergen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Sociol, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Landscape Architecture & Environm Planning, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Causal analysis; Context effects; Decision rules; Machine learning; Network analysis; Rational choice; Social sciences; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; ATTITUDES; PREFERENCES; HETEROGENEITY; OPPORTUNITY; INSIGHTS; BEHAVIOR; SIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100270
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper argues that choice modelling is a useful approach for all social sciences, while at the same time disciplines such as sociology and political science can contribute significantly to the future development of choice modelling. So far choice modelling has mainly been applied in disciplines that investigate types of consumption choices, be it marketing to investigate preferences for new products, transportation to analyse mode choices, or environmental economics to elicit preferences for public goods. However, using the information that can be gained from individual choices among mutually exclusive alternatives has gained increasing popularity in other disciplines as a powerful tool to test theoretical hypotheses and generate insights into individual behaviour. Examples are the acceptance of refugee shelters in peoples' neighbourhood, the choice of where to commit a crime or the evolution of social networks. A good point of departure for an expansion of choice modelling within the social sciences is the common foundation that many disciplines share that are gathered under the umbrella of social sciences. Research traditions and theoretical models include rational choice concepts, and choice modelling can be linked to crosscutting methods, including agent-based models, network analysis, and machine learning. At the same time, disciplines can complement each other in studying choice behaviour, as they can contribute concepts and tools less familiar to the other disciplines. Finally, all social science disciplines face challenges when it comes to issues such as causal analysis, heterogeneity in decision rules, joint decision making, or big data. Choice modelling and a cross-disciplinary dialogue can contribute to meeting these challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] Ajzen I., 1988, ATTITUDES PERSONALIT
  • [3] Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis
    Alwosheel, Ahmad
    van Cranenburgh, Sander
    Chorus, Caspar G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2018, 28 : 167 - 182
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, ARXIV171104826
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1981, SOCIO METHODOL
  • [6] FAMILY-STRUCTURE AND HOME-LEAVING - A FURTHER SPECIFICATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP
    AQUILINO, WS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1991, 53 (04): : 999 - 1010
  • [7] Auspurg K., 2015, Improving survey methods: Lessons from recent research
  • [8] Auspurg Karin., 2015, Experimente in Den Sozialwissenschaften, P291
  • [9] About attitudes and perceptions: finding the proper way to consider latent variables in discrete choice models
    Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J.
    Kunert, Uwe
    Link, Heike
    de Dios Ortuzar, Juan
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2017, 44 (03) : 475 - 493
  • [10] The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments
    Bansak, Kirk
    Hainmueller, Jens
    Hopkins, Daniel J.
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 26 (01) : 112 - 119