Proximal humerus fracture sequelae - Impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty

被引:117
作者
Boileau, Pascal
Chuinard, Christopher
Le Huec, Jean-Charles
Walch, Gilles
Trojani, Christophe
机构
[1] Med Univ Nice, Hop Archet, Dept Orthopaed Surg, F-06202 Nice, France
[2] Hop Pellegrin, Nice, France
[3] Clin Ste Anne Lumiere, Lyon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000195679.87258.6e
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Our goal was to analyze the results of unconstrained shoulder replacement in a large series of sequelae of proximal humeral fractures in order to validate a previously described surgical classification. In a multicenter study, we retrospectively evaluated 203 patients with sequelae of proximal humeral fractures who were treated with a nonconstrained modular and adaptable prosthesis. The mean followup was 42 months (range, 24-96 months). We identified 137 impacted fractures with humeral head collapse or necrosis (Type 1 sequelae), 25 unreducible dislocations or fracture-dislocations (Type 2), 22 nonunions of the surgical neck (Type 3), and 19 severe tuberosity malunions (Type 4). Results of nonconstrained shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 sequelae were predictably good because no greater tuberosity osteotomy was performed. The distorted anatomy was accepted, and both the prosthesis and technique were modified accordingly. Total shoulder arthroplasty yielded better results than hemiarthroplasty. Patients with Type 3 or Type 4 sequelae had poor functional results with nonconstrained arthroplasty because greater tuberosity osteotomy was needed. This study validates our fracture sequelae classification. We no longer use unconstrained prostheses in Type 3 and Type 4 fracture sequelae and propose peg bone grafting or low-profile fracture prosthesis for patients with Type 3 sequelae and reverse arthroplasty for those with Type 4 sequelae.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 130
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral nonunions [J].
Antuña, SA ;
Sperling, JW ;
Sánchez-Sotelo, J ;
Cofield, RH .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (02) :114-121
[2]   Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral malunions:: Long-term results [J].
Antuña, SA ;
Sperling, JW ;
Sánchez-Sotelo, J ;
Cofield, RH .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (02) :122-129
[3]   Operative treatment of malunion of a fracture of the proximal aspect of the humerus [J].
Beredjiklian, PK ;
Iannotti, JP ;
Norris, TR ;
Williams, GR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (10) :1484-1497
[4]   Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus [J].
Boileau, P ;
Trojani, C ;
Walch, G ;
Krishnan, SG ;
Romeo, A ;
Sinnerton, R .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (04) :299-308
[5]   The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus - Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design [J].
Boileau, P ;
Walch, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (05) :857-865
[6]   Grammont reverse prosthesis: Design, rationale, and biomechanics [J].
Boileau, P ;
Watkinson, DJ ;
Hatzidakis, AM ;
Balg, F .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2005, 14 (01) :147S-161S
[7]  
Boileau P., 1999, SHOULDER ARTHROPLAST
[8]  
COFIELD RH, 1987, SHOULDER REPLACEMENT, P157
[9]  
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
[10]  
Dines D M, 1993, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V2, P11, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80132-8