Effects of left ventricular assist devices on outcomes in patients undergoing heart transplantation

被引:85
作者
Bank, AJ
Mir, SH
Nguyen, DQ
Bolman, RM
Shumway, SJ
Miller, LW
Kaiser, DR
Ormaza, SM
Park, SJ
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01083-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly being used to "bridge" patients to heart transplantation. Methods. Data from 40 consecutive status 1 heart transplantation patients treated with intravenous inotrope therapy (n = 20) or the HeartMate LVAD (n = 20) were retrospectively analyzed. Results. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. At the time of transplantation, LVAD patients had significantly higher blood pressure and sodium with significantly lower blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. After transplantation, renal failure (52.6% versus 16.7%) and right heart failure (31.6% versus 5.6%) occurred more frequently (p < 0.05) in the inotrope group. Six-month survival after transplantation did not significantly differ in the inotrope or LVAD groups (73.7% versus 88.9%) but event-free survival was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the inotrope group (15.8% versus 55.6%). Total hospital charges were significantly lower in the inotrope group ($213,860 +/- $107,560 versus $342,620 +/- $104,420), but average daily hospital charges were not different ($3,990 +/- $1,300 versus $4,130 +/- $2,050). Conclusions. Status 1 heart transplant patients treated with an LVAD as opposed to inotrope therapy have improved clinical and metabolic function at the time of transplant and improved survival to 6 months after transplant without major complications. Total costs are higher in the LVAD patients but average daily costs are similar. (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1374
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Argenziano M, 1997, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V16, P822
  • [2] Ashton Robert C. Jr., 1995, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, V14, pS68
  • [3] Billingham M E, 1990, J Heart Transplant, V9, P587
  • [4] Outpatient left ventricular assist device support: A destination rather than a bridge
    Catanese, KA
    Goldstein, DJ
    Williams, DL
    Foray, AT
    Illick, CD
    Gardocki, MT
    Weinberg, AD
    Levin, HR
    Rose, EA
    Oz, MC
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (03) : 646 - 652
  • [5] NEUROHORMONAL ACTIVATION AND EXERCISE FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEART-FAILURE AND PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    ESTRADAQUINTERO, T
    URETSKY, BF
    MURALI, S
    GRIFFITH, BP
    KORMOS, RL
    [J]. CHEST, 1995, 107 (06) : 1499 - 1503
  • [6] Infectious complications in left ventricular assist device recipients
    Fischer, SA
    Trenholme, GM
    Costanzo, MR
    Piccione, W
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 24 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [7] MULTICENTER CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF THE HEARTMATE 1000-IP LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
    FRAZIER, OH
    ROSE, EA
    MACMANUS, Q
    BURTON, NA
    LEFRAK, EA
    POIRIER, VL
    DASSE, KA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1992, 53 (06) : 1080 - 1090
  • [8] LOISANCE D, 1991, T AM SOC ART INT ORG, V37, pM125
  • [9] Comparison of exercise performance in patients with chronic severe heart failure versus left ventricular assist devices
    Mancini, D
    Goldsmith, R
    Levin, H
    Beniaminovitz, A
    Rose, E
    Catanese, K
    Flannery, M
    Oz, M
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (12) : 1178 - 1183
  • [10] Marrone T.M., 1996, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V15, P423