Predictive Validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) Among a Sample of Asian Canadian Youth on Probation

被引:6
作者
Li, Shanna M. Y. [1 ]
Viljoen, Jodi L. [1 ]
Christiansen, Aisha K. [1 ]
Muir, Nicole M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Psychol, 8888 Univ Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
SAVRY; risk assessment; predictive validity; recidivism; Asian Canadian; MENTAL-HEALTH; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; YOUNG OFFENDERS; JUVENILE; DISCRIMINATION; ADOLESCENTS; YLS/CMI; AREA; INDIVIDUALISM; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1037/lhb0000431
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Objective: Although past studies suggest that the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY; Borum et al., 2006) has moderate predictive validity, its predictive validity with Asian youth in Western countries is unknown. We therefore compared the SAVRY's predictive validity in a sample of Asian Canadian versus White Canadian youth. Hypotheses: Given that the SAVRY is normed on samples comprising mostly youth who are White, we expected its predictive validity for recidivism would be lower for Asian Canadians than White Canadians. Method: We examined youth probation officers' SAVRY assessments for 573 youth (445 White Canadians, 56 East/Southeast Asian Canadians, and 72 South Asian Canadians) on community supervision (i.e. probation) in a Canadian province. Youth were prospectively followed for an average of 1.97 years (SD = 0.56 years) to determine if they were subsequently charged with violent or nonviolent offenses. Results: Asian Canadians scored significantly lower on risk total scores compared to White Canadians. Predictive validity for violent and nonviolent recidivism fell in the medium to large range for East/Southeast Asian Canadians (AUCs = .69 to .89) and South Asian Canadians (AUCs = .64 to .83). In comparison, predictive validity for White Canadians was generally lower (AUCs = .63 to .77; small to large range). Risk total scores and nonviolent risk ratings significantly predicted nonviolent recidivism better for East/Southeast Asian Canadians (AUCs = .89 and .87, respectively) than White Canadians (AUCs = .77 and .71, respectively). Despite few significant differences between Asian subgroups, predictive validity for nonviolent risk ratings was significantly higher in East/Southeast Asian Canadians (AUC = .87) than South Asian Canadians (AUC = .64). Conclusions: The SAVRY may be a useful tool for predicting recidivism with Asian Canadians. However, future research should examine the SAVRY's predictive validity for youth of Asian descent in different countries and contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 501
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Identifying Gender Specific Risk/Need Areas for Male and Female Juvenile Offenders: Factor Analyses With the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) [J].
Hilterman, Ed L. B. ;
Bongers, Ilja ;
Nicholls, Tonia L. ;
van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 40 (01) :82-96
[32]   Are Youth Violence Risk Instruments Interchangeable? Evaluating Instrument Convergence in a Sample of Incarcerated Adolescent Offenders [J].
Shepherd, Stephane M. ;
Luebbers, Stefan ;
Ogloff, James R. P. .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY PRACTICE, 2014, 14 (04) :317-341
[33]   Evaluating the Predictive Validity of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) Risk Assessment Tool for Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Youth [J].
Macisaac, Angela ;
Killen, Amy ;
Schmidt, Fred .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2025,
[34]   Risk and Protective Factors for Probation Success Among Youth Offenders in Singapore [J].
Li, Dongdong ;
Chu, Chi Meng ;
Xu, Xuexin ;
Zeng, Gerald ;
Ruby, Kala .
YOUTH VIOLENCE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE, 2019, 17 (02) :194-213
[35]   The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF): A Meta-Analysis of Its Predictive and Incremental Validity [J].
Burghart, Matthias ;
de Ruiter, Corine ;
Hynes, Sophia Elianne ;
Krishnan, Nishant ;
Levtova, Yara ;
Uyar, Abdo .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 35 (01) :56-67
[36]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHANGES IN DYNAMIC RISK FACTORS AND THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF RISK ASSESSMENTS AMONG YOUTH OFENDERS [J].
Clarke, Maggie C. ;
Peterson-Badali, Michele ;
Skiling, Tracey A. .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 44 (10) :1340-1355
[37]   The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth Demonstrates Measurement Invariance Between Black and White Justice-Referred Youths [J].
Cohn, Jonathan R. ;
Perrault, Rachael T. ;
Cicero, David C. ;
Vincent, Gina M. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2024, 48 (5-6) :415-426
[38]   A Second Proof of Concept Investigation of Strengths Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth Tool With Justice-Involved Youth: Item Level Risk-Based Effects and Interactions [J].
Langton, Calvin M. ;
Worling, James R. ;
Sheinin, Gabriela D. B. .
YOUTH VIOLENCE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE, 2024, 22 (04) :251-276
[39]   An Evaluation of the Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in Justice-Involved Youth With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder [J].
McLachlan, Kaitlyn ;
Gray, Andrew L. ;
Roesch, Ronald ;
Douglas, Kevin S. ;
Viljoen, Jodi L. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 30 (12) :1640-1651
[40]   The Validity of Risk Assessment Instruments for Transition-Age Youth [J].
Vincent, Gina M. ;
Drawbridge, Dara ;
Davis, Maryann .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 87 (02) :171-183