Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: First 100 patients with one year of follow-up

被引:55
作者
Mikhail, Albert A. [1 ]
Orvieto, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Billatos, Ehab S. [1 ]
Zorn, Kevin C. [1 ]
Gong, Edward M. [1 ]
Brendler, Charles B. [1 ]
Zagaja, Gregory P. [1 ]
Shalhav, Arieh L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, Chicago, IL 60738 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To report our initial experience of 100 patients with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Continued technological advances have expanded our armamentarium of minimally invasive devices and techniques to offer our patients. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been adopted at many centers. Methods. This was a nonrandomized prospective study evaluating our initial 100 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The follow-up data were obtained prospectively using the validated Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 1 2 months postoperatively. Patients who required open conversion were excluded from the outcome analysis. Patients who received a sural nerve graft were excluded from the operative analysis. Results. The average age and body mass index of all patients were 58.4 years (range 42 to 70) and 28.5 kg/m(2) (range 18.1 to 50.6), respectively, with a median follow-up of 12 months. The average prostate-specific antigen level was 6.07 ng/mL. Seven patients required conversion to an open technique, and four underwent sural nerve grafting. The positive surgical margin rate was 16% (15 of 92). Using the Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index health surveys, the average percentage of return to baseline urinary function was 52%, 70%, 79%, and 84% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The overall average percentage of return to baseline sexual function was 51%, 58%, 66%, and 80% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and efficient method for achieving prostate cancer control even during the initial learning curve for this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1279
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Ahlering, TE
    Skarecky, D
    Lee, D
    Clayman, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) : 1738 - 1741
  • [2] Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy
    Ahlering, TE
    Eichel, L
    Edwards, R
    Skarecky, DW
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) : 740 - 744
  • [3] Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation
    Chien, GW
    Mikhail, AA
    Orvieto, MA
    Zagaja, GP
    Sokoloff, MH
    Brendler, CB
    Shalhav, AL
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (02) : 419 - 423
  • [4] Robotics in urology
    Hemal, AK
    Menon, M
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [5] Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Results from CaPSURE
    Hu, JC
    Elkin, EP
    Pasta, DJ
    Lubeck, DP
    Kattan, MW
    Carroll, PR
    Litwin, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) : 703 - 707
  • [6] Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Link, RE
    Su, LM
    Sullivan, W
    Bhayani, SB
    Pavlovich, CP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01) : 175 - 179
  • [7] The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index - Development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure
    Litwin, MS
    Hays, RD
    Fink, A
    Ganz, PA
    Leake, B
    Brook, RH
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (07) : 1002 - 1012
  • [8] Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 100 cases
    Menon, M
    Tewari, A
    Peabody, JO
    Shrivastava, A
    Kaul, S
    Bhandari, A
    Hemal, AK
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (04) : 701 - +
  • [9] Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: An interim analysis of results and technical points
    Menon, M
    Tewari, A
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (04) : 15 - 20
  • [10] Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience
    Menon, M
    Tewari, A
    Baize, B
    Guillonneau, B
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) : 864 - 868