STOMATA CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO PAULOWNIA SPECIES UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF LIGHT

被引:0
|
作者
Mitrovic, Suzana [1 ]
Jokanovic, Dusan [2 ]
Vilotic, Dragica [2 ]
Miljkovic, Danijela [3 ]
Veselinovic, Milorad [1 ]
Stankovic, Dragica [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Dept Evolutionary Biol, Inst Biol Res Sinisa Stankovic, Belgrade, Serbia
来源
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN | 2017年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
Paulownia elongata; Paulownia fortunei; light intensity; stomata density; stomata pore surface; PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES; ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS; WATER-STRESS; GROWTH; DENSITY; SHADE; QUALITY; LEAVES; RESPIRATION; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper shows results of research of different light intensity impact on stomata number (stomata density-SD) and stomata area (stomata pore surface-SPS). There were analysed two Paulownia species Paulownia elongata and Paulownia fortune that grew under low and high light intensity. Basic testing hypothesis was related to characteristics of stomata between open and shaded treatment for each of analysed species, and to differences between stomata characteristics for each of species inside the treatment, as well. Due to results of t-test, average values of SD and SPS differed statistically significant for each of analysed species between various light treatments. Species differed statistically significant in average values of analysed stomata characteristics just in treatment with low light intensity. Based on three-way ANOVA results, all sources of phenotypic variability were statistically significant. Interaction between light treatment and species was statistically significant, as well, that shows different species response inside the treatment. Differences between species for analysed stomata characteristics depend on light intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:1876 / 1882
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gas exchange in Paulownia species growing under different soil moisture conditions in the field
    Llano-Sotelo, J. M.
    Alcaraz-Melendez, L.
    Castellanos Villegas, A. E.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (04): : 497 - 502
  • [2] Survival and growth of two coexisting evergreen oak species after germination under different light conditions
    Tanouchi, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 1996, 157 (04) : 516 - 522
  • [3] Performance of two Rhinanthus species under different hydric conditions
    Véronique Ducarme
    Renate A. Wesselingh
    Plant Ecology, 2010, 206
  • [4] Performance of two Rhinanthus species under different hydric conditions
    Ducarme, Veronique
    Wesselingh, Renate A.
    PLANT ECOLOGY, 2010, 206 (02) : 263 - 277
  • [5] Behaviour under different light conditions of two arabidopsis ecotypes
    Leclerc, JC
    Briane, JP
    Blaise, S
    PHOTOSYNTHESIS: MECHANISMS AND EFFECTS, VOLS I-V, 1998, : 2601 - 2604
  • [6] The effect of different nursery conditions on some of the leaf and stomata characteristics in Chestnuts
    Ahmet, Ozturk
    Umit, Serdar
    Naile, Gurgor Pinar
    Adnan, Korkmaz
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BOTANY AND FOOD QUALITY, 2014, 87 : 190 - 195
  • [7] GERMINATION OF 15 CERRADO PLANT SPECIES UNDER DIFFERENT LIGHT CONDITIONS
    Correia Lima, Yuri Bertelli
    Durigan, Giselda
    Souza, Flaviana Maluf
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2014, 30 (06): : 1864 - 1872
  • [8] STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NUMBER OF STOMATA IN COFFEA UNDER DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS
    DANIEL, JS
    ABRAMOF, IRK
    SILVA, T
    BIOMETRICS, 1957, 13 (02) : 238 - 239
  • [9] Production and fate of fishy odorants produced by two freshwater chrysophyte species under different temperature and light conditions
    Liu, Tingting
    Yu, Jianwei
    Su, Ming
    Jia, Zeyu
    Wang, Chunmiao
    Zhang, Ye
    Dou, Chunhua
    Burch, Michael
    Yang, Min
    WATER RESEARCH, 2019, 157 : 529 - 534
  • [10] Species-species interactions modulate copper toxicity under different visible light conditions
    Cheloni, Giulia
    Gagnaux, Valerie
    Slaveykova, Vera I.
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2019, 170 : 771 - 777