Implications for constructed wetlands to mitigate nitrate and pesticide pollution in agricultural drained watersheds

被引:96
|
作者
Tournebize, Julien [1 ]
Chaumont, Cedric [1 ]
Mander, Ulo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Irstea, Hydrosyst & Bioproc Res Unit, Antony, France
[2] Univ Tartu, Inst Ecol & Earth Sci, Tartu, Estonia
关键词
Artificial wetland; Buffer zone; Catchment; Design recommendations; Non-point source pollution; Removal efficiency; Tile drainage; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SEINE RIVER-BASIN; SURFACE-WATER; ARTIFICIAL WETLAND; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST BUFFER; TILE DRAINAGE; NITROGEN; REMOVAL; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.02.014
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In the context of subsurface drainage, the mitigation of agricultural pollutants means intercepting water flows using green infrastructures such as constructed wetlands (CWs). First, based on a scientific review, this paper analyses how efficiently CWs can remove nitrate and pesticides from the runoff in drained agricultural watersheds. Average efficiency ranges from 20 to 90% and from 40 to 90% for pesticides and nitrate respectively. The main processes involved are based on microbiological activities, for which hydraulic residence time is a key factor. In order to successful implementation of such a wetland system, hydrological diagnosis of water flow and pollutant transfer at different watershed scales should be provided. Typically, the transport and transformation of pollutants shows clear seasonality depending on the application of nitrate (throughout the whole year) and pesticides (only after application periods). We suggest two interception strategies based on field experiments. The on-stream strategy means the establishment of free water surface (FWS) CWs directly on streams/ditches and the interception of all drainage flows: a solution suitable for nitrate removal. The off-stream strategy requires the establishment of CWs outside of streams/ditches, whereas interception targets only the most polluted water flow, for instance during the period after pesticide application, requiring farmer's involvement. Suggestions are also made for FWS CW design (a geotechnical survey, topography constraints, etc.) respecting ecological engineering concepts. A following size range is proposed: 76m(3) per drained hectare, equivalent to 1% of the upstream area, given a maximum water depth of 0.8m. Nevertheless, CWs must be considered as a complementary tool dedicated to transfer reduction, and as part of broader actions aimed at reducing pollutant loading at the plot scale. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 425
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] A GEOSPATIAL APPROACH TO TARGETING CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS FOR NITRATE REMOVAL IN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS
    Kalcic, M.
    Chaubcy, I.
    Frankenbcrgcr, J.
    Kladivko, E.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 28 (03) : 347 - 357
  • [2] Potential of constructed wetlands to reduce nitrate pollution in agricultural catchments
    Bauwe, Andreas
    Eckhardt, Kai-Uwe
    Lennartz, Bernd
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 178
  • [3] CO-DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS TO MITIGATE PESTICIDE POLLUTION IN A DRAINED CATCH-BASIN: A SOLUTION TO IMPROVE GROUNDWATER QUALITY
    Tournebize, Julien
    Gramaglia, Christelle
    Birmant, Francois
    Bouarfa, Sami
    Chaumont, Cedric
    Vincent, Bernard
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2012, 61 : 75 - 86
  • [4] Agricultural pollutant removal by constructed wetlands: Implications for water management and design
    Diaz, Francisco J.
    O'Geen, Anthony T.
    Dahlgren, Randy A.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2012, 104 : 171 - 183
  • [5] On the potential of on-line free-surface constructed wetlands for attenuating pesticide losses from agricultural land to surface waters
    Ramos, Andre
    Whelan, Michael J.
    Guymer, Ian
    Villa, Raffaella
    Jefferson, Bruce
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 16 (08) : 563 - 576
  • [6] Is Flood Irrigation a Potential Driver of River-Groundwater Interactions and Diffuse Nitrate Pollution in Agricultural Watersheds?
    Racchetti, Erica
    Salmaso, Francesca
    Pinardi, Monica
    Quadroni, Silvia
    Soana, Elisa
    Sacchi, Elisa
    Severini, Edoardo
    Celico, Fulvio
    Viaroli, Pierluigi
    Bartoli, Marco
    WATER, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [7] Field engineering application of agricultural farmland surface runoff pollution treatment by combined bioreactor and constructed wetlands
    Luo, H.
    Li, X.
    Chen, Y.
    Liu, X.
    Zhang, K.
    Fu, X.
    Jiang, B.
    Xue, R.
    Yang, J.
    Li, M.
    Chen, W.
    Fan, L.
    Chen, F.
    Zhang, X.
    Anderson, B. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 19 (06) : 5493 - 5510
  • [8] A multi-criteria analysis for siting surface-flow constructed wetlands in tile-drained agricultural catchments: The case of Lithuania
    Punys, P.
    Radzevicius, A.
    Kvaraciejus, A.
    Gasiunas, V.
    Silinis, L.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 213 : 1036 - 1046
  • [9] Constructed wetlands to solve agricultural drainage pollution in South Florida: Development of an advanced simulation tool for design optimization
    Garcia, Joan
    Solimeno, Alessandro
    Zhang, Li
    Marois, Darryl
    Mitsch, William J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 258
  • [10] Nitrate removal in surface-flow constructed wetlands treating dilute agricultural runoff in the lower Yakima Basin, Washington
    Beutel, Marc W.
    Newton, Crystal D.
    Brouillard, Elaine S.
    Watts, Richard J.
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 35 (10) : 1538 - 1546