Implications for constructed wetlands to mitigate nitrate and pesticide pollution in agricultural drained watersheds

被引:101
作者
Tournebize, Julien [1 ]
Chaumont, Cedric [1 ]
Mander, Ulo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Irstea, Hydrosyst & Bioproc Res Unit, Antony, France
[2] Univ Tartu, Inst Ecol & Earth Sci, Tartu, Estonia
关键词
Artificial wetland; Buffer zone; Catchment; Design recommendations; Non-point source pollution; Removal efficiency; Tile drainage; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SEINE RIVER-BASIN; SURFACE-WATER; ARTIFICIAL WETLAND; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST BUFFER; TILE DRAINAGE; NITROGEN; REMOVAL; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.02.014
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In the context of subsurface drainage, the mitigation of agricultural pollutants means intercepting water flows using green infrastructures such as constructed wetlands (CWs). First, based on a scientific review, this paper analyses how efficiently CWs can remove nitrate and pesticides from the runoff in drained agricultural watersheds. Average efficiency ranges from 20 to 90% and from 40 to 90% for pesticides and nitrate respectively. The main processes involved are based on microbiological activities, for which hydraulic residence time is a key factor. In order to successful implementation of such a wetland system, hydrological diagnosis of water flow and pollutant transfer at different watershed scales should be provided. Typically, the transport and transformation of pollutants shows clear seasonality depending on the application of nitrate (throughout the whole year) and pesticides (only after application periods). We suggest two interception strategies based on field experiments. The on-stream strategy means the establishment of free water surface (FWS) CWs directly on streams/ditches and the interception of all drainage flows: a solution suitable for nitrate removal. The off-stream strategy requires the establishment of CWs outside of streams/ditches, whereas interception targets only the most polluted water flow, for instance during the period after pesticide application, requiring farmer's involvement. Suggestions are also made for FWS CW design (a geotechnical survey, topography constraints, etc.) respecting ecological engineering concepts. A following size range is proposed: 76m(3) per drained hectare, equivalent to 1% of the upstream area, given a maximum water depth of 0.8m. Nevertheless, CWs must be considered as a complementary tool dedicated to transfer reduction, and as part of broader actions aimed at reducing pollutant loading at the plot scale. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 425
页数:11
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]   Influence of flooding on the degradation of linuron, isoproturon and metolachlor in soil [J].
Accinelli, C ;
Screpanti, C ;
Vicari, A .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 25 (03) :401-406
[2]   Atrazine fate and transport in the Des Plaines Wetlands [J].
Alvord, HH ;
Kadlec, RH .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1996, 90 (01) :97-107
[3]   Atrazine mineralization potential in two wetlands [J].
Anderson, KL ;
Wheeler, KA ;
Robinson, JB ;
Tuovinen, OH .
WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (19) :4785-4794
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS AGROPARISTECH
[6]  
Appelboom T.W., 2006, P ASABE ANN M
[7]   Effects of vegetation and hydraulic load on seasonal nitrate removal in treatment wetlands [J].
Bastviken, Sofia Kallner ;
Weisner, Stefan E. B. ;
Thiere, Geraldine ;
Svensson, Jonas M. ;
Ehde, Per Magnus ;
Tonderski, Karin S. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 35 (05) :946-952
[8]   Denitrification and a Nitrogen Budget of Created Riparian Wetlands [J].
Batson, Jacqulyn A. ;
Mander, Uelo ;
Mitsch, William J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2012, 41 (06) :2024-2032
[9]  
Bays J., 2000, P WAT ENV FED WEFTEC, V2000, P15, DOI 10.2175/193864700784546224
[10]   Nitrate removal in surface-flow constructed wetlands treating dilute agricultural runoff in the lower Yakima Basin, Washington [J].
Beutel, Marc W. ;
Newton, Crystal D. ;
Brouillard, Elaine S. ;
Watts, Richard J. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 35 (10) :1538-1546