A systematic review to examine the relationship between objective and patient-reported outcome measures in sinonasal disorders: recommendations for use in research and clinical practice

被引:54
作者
Ta, Ngan Hong [1 ]
Gao, Jack [2 ]
Philpott, Carl [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[2] East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Fdn Trust, ENT Dept, Colchester, Essex, England
[3] James Paget Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, ENT Dept, Great Yarmouth, England
关键词
chronic rhinosinusitis; rhinitis; allergic rhinitis; olfactory test; mucociliary clearance; patient-reported outcome measures; SNOT-22; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SMELL IDENTIFICATION TEST; NASAL AIR-FLOW; SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS; OLFACTORY DYSFUNCTION; ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY; MUCOCILIARY TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1002/alr.22744
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Common sinonasal disorders include chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and a deviated nasal septum (DNS), which often coexist with shared common symptoms including nasal obstruction, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea. Various objective outcome measures and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to assess disease severity; however, there is limited evidence in the literature on the correlation between them. This systematic review aims to examine the relationship between them and provide recommendations. Methods: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified studies quantifying correlations between objective outcome measures and PROMs for the sinonasal conditions using a narrative synthesis. Results: In total, 59 studies met inclusion criteria. For nasal obstruction, rhinomanometry shows a lack of correlation whereas peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) shows the strongest correlation with PROMs (r > 0.5). The Sniffin' Stick test shows a stronger correlation with PROMs (r > 0.5) than the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) (r < 0.5). Computed tomography (CT) sinus scores show little evidence of correlation with PROMs and nasal endoscopic ratings (weak correlation, r < 0.5). Conclusion: Overall, objective outcome measures and PROMs assessing sinonasal symptoms are poorly correlated, and we recommend that objective outcome measures be used with validated PROMs depending on the setting. PNIF should be used in routine clinical practice for nasal obstruction; rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry may be useful in research. The Sniffin' Sticks test is recommended for olfactory dysfunction with UPSIT as an alternative. CT scores should be excluded as a routine CRS outcome measure, and endoscopic scores should be used in combination with PROMs until further research is conducted. (C) 2020 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 923
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Michelle M. Holmes
    George Lewith
    David Newell
    Jonathan Field
    Felicity L. Bishop
    Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 245 - 257
  • [2] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Holmes, Michelle M.
    Lewith, George
    Newell, David
    Field, Jonathan
    Bishop, Felicity L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (02) : 245 - 257
  • [3] Patient-reported outcome measures for use in gynaecological oncology: a systematic review
    Preston, N. J.
    Wilson, N.
    Wood, N. J.
    Brine, J.
    Ferreira, J.
    Brearley, S. G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (05) : 615 - 622
  • [4] Association of Sinonasal Computed Tomography Scores to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chen, Tiffany
    Chidarala, Shreya
    Young, Gabrielle
    Jeong, Seth S.
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Edwards, Thomas S.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 168 (04) : 628 - 634
  • [5] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [6] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [7] Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers
    Antunes, Barbara
    Harding, Richard
    Higginson, Irene J.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) : 158 - 175
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
    Ralphsmith, Maisie
    Ahern, Susannah
    Dean, Joanne
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (09) : 2325 - 2334
  • [9] Choosing and Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice
    Kroenke, Kurt
    Miksch, Timothy A.
    Spaulding, Aaron C.
    Mazza, Gina L.
    DeStephano, Christopher C.
    Niazi, Shehzad K.
    Illies, Allie J. Canoy
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Novotny, Paull
    Goyal, Anshit
    Lee, Minji K.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 103 (05): : S108 - S117
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: A systematic review
    Beighley, Adam
    Zhang, Allen
    Huang, Brendan
    Carr, Christopher
    Mathkour, Mansour
    Werner, Cassidy
    Scullen, Tyler
    Kilgore, Mitchell D.
    Maulucci, Christopher M.
    Dallapiazza, Robert F.
    Kalyvas, James
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (04) : 378 - 389