Oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body removal: complications and follow-up of 102 dogs

被引:70
作者
Gianella, P. [1 ]
Pfammatter, N. S. [1 ]
Burgener, I. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Div Small Anim Internal Med, Dept Clin Vet Med, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
BODIES; PERFORATION; RETRIEVAL; DIAGNOSIS; CATS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00845.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess complication rate, risk factors for complications and outcome in dogs with oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body (FB) removal. Methods Medical records of 102 dogs undergoing endoscopic removal of oesophageal and/or gastric FBs from March 2001 to November 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. All owners were contacted by telephone to provide follow-up information. Results West Highland white terriers, Yorkshire terriers and Bernese mountain dogs were over-represented compared to the hospital population. Endoscopy alone was successful in 92/102 dogs (90 center dot 2 per cent), whereas gastrotomy (but no oesophagotomy) was required in 10 dogs (9 center dot 8 per cent). Complications in 13/102 dogs (12 center dot 7 per cent) were perforation (8), oesophageal stricture (1), oesophageal diverticula (1), perioesophageal abscess (1), pneumothorax and pleural effusion (1) and respiratory arrest (1). Six dogs (all weighing < 10 kg) had complications resulting in death or euthanasia. Bone FBs, bodyweight of less than 10 kg, and oesophageal or gastric FB in place for more than three days were significant risk factors for complications. Of the dogs available for follow-up (75/96), 92 per cent had no complications after discharge. Clinical Significance Endoscopic FB removal is associated with a low overall complication rate with bone FBs and bodyweight of less than 10 kg as significant risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 654
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Esophagoscopy [J].
Gualtieri, M .
VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2001, 31 (04) :605-+
[2]   THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL FOREIGN-BODIES IN THE DOG - A REVIEW OF 90 CASES [J].
HOULTON, JEF ;
HERRTAGE, ME ;
TAYLOR, PM ;
WATKINS, SB .
JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 1985, 26 (09) :521-536
[3]  
Kaiser S, 2003, KLEINTIERPRAXIS, V48, P397
[4]  
King JM, 2001, VET MED-US, V96, P828
[5]   Esophageal foreign body obstruction caused by a dental chew treat in 31 dogs (2000-2006) [J].
Leib, Michael S. ;
Sartor, Laura Lee .
JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 232 (07) :1021-1025
[6]  
Luthi C., 1998, European Journal of Comparative Gastroenterology, V3, P7
[7]  
MICHELS GM, 1995, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V207, P1194
[8]   Removal of oesophageal foreign bodies in dogs: use of the fluoroscopic method and outcome [J].
Moore, AH .
JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2001, 42 (05) :227-230
[9]  
PARKER NR, 1989, J AM ANIM HOSP ASSOC, V25, P587
[10]   Incidence and characterization of esophagitis following esophageal foreign body removal in dogs: 60 cases (1999-2003) [J].
Rousseau, Alexandre ;
Prittie, Jennifer ;
Broussard, John D. ;
Fox, Philip R. ;
Hoskinson, James .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 17 (02) :159-163