A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone

被引:0
作者
Wennerberg, A [1 ]
Ektessabi, A [1 ]
Albrektsson, T [1 ]
Johansson, C [1 ]
Andersson, B [1 ]
机构
[1] KYOTO UNIV,FAC ENGN,DEPT PRECIS ENGN,KYOTO,JAPAN
关键词
bone fixation; implants; surface roughness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Screw-shaped implants were prepared with three different surface topographies: One was left as machined, ie, a turned surface, and two were blasted surfaces with differing degrees of surface roughness. The surface topography was measured with a confocal laser scanning profilometer and the surface roughness was characterized using height and spatial descriptive parameters. The turned surface had an average surface roughness of 0.96 mu m and an average peak spacing of 8.6 mu m. The two blasted surfaces had surface roughness values of 1.16 mu m and 1.94 mu m, respectively; the corresponding values for the peak spacing parameter were 10.00 mu m and 13.22 mu m, respectively. After 1 year in rabbit bone, the bone response to the turned implants was compared with the response to the two blasted implant surfaces. Firmer bone fixation was found for the two blasted surfaces, with statistically significant increases in removal torque and percentage of bone-to-metal contact. Furthermore, about 2 mm from the implant surface, the titanium release was similar for the turned and the 25-mu m aluminum oxide-blasted implants.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 494
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   INHIBITION OF APATITE FORMATION BY TITANIUM AND VANADIUM IONS [J].
BLUMENTHAL, NC ;
COSMA, V .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 1989, 23 (A1) :13-22
[2]  
*BRIT STAND I, 1988, 1134 BRIT STAND I 1
[3]   TITANIUM-COATED MICROMACHINED GROOVES OF DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS AFFECT EPITHELIAL AND CONNECTIVE-TISSUE CELLS DIFFERENTLY INVIVO [J].
CHEHROUDI, B ;
GOULD, TRL ;
BRUNETTE, DM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1990, 24 (09) :1203-1219
[4]  
Donath K., 1988, PRAPARATOR, V34, P197
[5]  
DUCHEYNE P, 1988, Journal of Oral Implantology, V14, P325
[6]  
DUCHEYNE P, 1994, J BIOMED MATER RES, V18, P293
[7]  
EKTESSABI AM, 1996, 5 INT C NUCL MICR TE
[8]  
EKTESSABI AM, 1994, INT J PIXE, V4, P81
[9]  
GOTTLANDER M, 1997, IN PRESS CLIN ORAL I
[10]  
Johansson C, 1987, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V2, P69