Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: A NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis

被引:37
|
作者
Hall, Bradley R. [1 ]
Flores, Aura E. [2 ]
Parshall, Zachary S. [1 ]
Shostrom, Valerie K. [3 ]
Are, Chandrakanth [4 ,5 ]
Reames, Bradley N. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Med, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Coll Publ Hlth, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[4] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[5] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Fred & Pamela Buffett Canc Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
关键词
anastomotic leak; cancer; esophagectomy; NSQIP; risk factor; BLOOD-CELL COUNT; OPERATING-ROOM EFFICIENCY; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; HOSPITAL VOLUME; TERM SURVIVAL; MORTALITY; RESECTION; SURGERY; MORBIDITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/jso.25613
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Anastomotic leak is the most common major complication after esophagectomy. We investigated the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program esophagectomy targeted database to identify risk factors for anastomotic leak. Methods Patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer were included. Patients experiencing an anstomotic leak were identified, and univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with anastomotic leak. Results Of 915 patients included, 83% were male and the median age was 64 years. Patients with anastomotic leak more frequently had additional complications (87% vs 36%, P < .001). Rates of reoperation (64% vs 11%, P < .001) and mortality (8% vs 2%, P = .001) were higher in patients with anastomotic leak. After adjusting for patient and procedure characteristics, prolonged operative time (for each additional 30-minutes; adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 1.068, 95% CI, 1.022-1.115, P = .003), increased preoperative WBC count (for each 3000/mu L increase; AOR 1.323, 95% CI, 1.048-1.670, P = .019), pre-existing diabetes (AOR 1.601, 95% CI, 1.012-2.534, P = .045), and perioperative transfusion (AOR 1.777, 95% CI, 1.064-2.965, P = .028) were independently associated with anastomotic leak. Conclusion Both patient and procedure-related factors are associated with anastomotic leak. Though frequently non-modifiable, these findings could facilitate risk stratification and early detection of anastomotic leak to reduce associated morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy
    Tabatabai, Abbas
    Hashemi, Mozaffar
    Mohajeri, Gholamreza
    Ahmadinejad, Mojtaba
    Khan, Ishfaq Abass
    Haghdani, Saeid
    ANNALS OF THORACIC MEDICINE, 2009, 4 (04) : 197 - 200
  • [2] Predictors of Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy for Cancer: Not All Leaks Increase Mortality
    Krasnoff, Chloe C.
    Grigorian, Areg
    Smith, Brian R.
    Jutric, Zeljka
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    Daly, Shaun
    Lekawa, Michael E.
    Nahmias, Jeffry
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2021, 87 (06) : 864 - 871
  • [3] Validation of the NUn score as a predictor of anastomotic leak and major complications after Esophagectomy
    Bundred, James
    Hollis, Alexander C.
    Hodson, James
    Hallissey, Mike T.
    Whiting, John L.
    Griffiths, Ewen A.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 33 (01)
  • [4] Risk Factors for Postoperative Anastomosis Leak After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Aoyama, Toru
    Atsumi, Yosuke
    Hara, Kentaro
    Tamagawa, Hiroshi
    Tamagawa, Ayako
    Komori, Keisuke
    Hashimoto, Itaru
    Maezawa, Yukio
    Kazama, Keisuke
    Kano, Kazuki
    Murakawa, Masaaki
    Numata, Masakatsu
    Oshima, Takashi
    Yukawa, Norio
    Masuda, Munetaka
    Rino, Yasushi
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (02): : 857 - 862
  • [5] Predictors of Anastomotic Leak in Elderly Patients After Colectomy: Nomogram-Based Assessment From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Program Procedure-Targeted Cohort
    Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
    Benlice, Cigdem
    Valente, Michael
    Abbas, Maher A.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    Gorgun, Emre
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (05) : 527 - 536
  • [6] Mortality and failure-to-rescue after esophagectomy in the procedure-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry
    Harris, Larkin B.
    Vyas, Vanessa
    Marino, Katy
    Wells, Allison
    Jensen, Hanna K.
    Mavros, Michail N.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (09) : 2235 - 2242
  • [7] An analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy
    Koji Tanaka
    Tomoki Makino
    Makoto Yamasaki
    Takahiko Nishigaki
    Yasuhiro Miyazaki
    Tsuyoshi Takahashi
    Yukinori Kurokawa
    Kiyokazu Nakajima
    Shuji Takiguchi
    Masaki Mori
    Yuichiro Doki
    Surgery Today, 2018, 48 : 449 - 454
  • [8] Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy With Intrathoracic Anastomosis
    Li, Huan
    Zhuang, Shimin
    Yan, Honghong
    Wei, Wenxiao
    Su, Quanguan
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [9] An analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy
    Tanaka, Koji
    Makino, Tomoki
    Yamasaki, Makoto
    Nishigaki, Takahiko
    Miyazaki, Yasuhiro
    Takahashi, Tsuyoshi
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Nakajima, Kiyokazu
    Takiguchi, Shuji
    Mori, Masaki
    Doki, Yuichiro
    SURGERY TODAY, 2018, 48 (04) : 449 - 454
  • [10] Risk Factors and Consequences of Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Cancer
    Hagens, Eliza R. C.
    Reijntjes, Maud A.
    Anderegg, Martinus C. J.
    Eshuis, Wietse J.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 112 (01) : 255 - 263