Predicting seismic-induced liquefaction through ensemble learning frameworks

被引:37
作者
Alobaidi, Mohammad H. [1 ]
Meguid, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Chebana, Fateh [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Civil Engn & Appl Mech, 817 Sherbrooke St West, Montreal, PQ H3A 0C3, Canada
[2] Inst Natl Rech Sci, Eau Terre Environm, 490 Rue Couronne, Quebec City, PQ G1K 9A9, Canada
关键词
DIVERSITY; MACHINE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-48044-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The regional nature of liquefaction records and limited information available for a certain set of explanatories motivate the development of complex prediction techniques. Indirect methods are commonly applied to incidentally derive a hyperplane to this binary classification problem. Machine learning approaches offer evolutionary prediction models which can be used as direct prediction methods to liquefaction occurrence. Ensemble learning is a recent advancement in this field. According to a predefined ensemble architecture, a number of learners are trained and their inferences are integrated to produce stable and improved generalization ability. However, there is a need to consider several aspects of the ensemble learning frameworks when exploiting them for a particular application; a comprehensive evaluation of an ensemble learner's generalization ability is required but usually overlooked. Also, the literature falls short on work utilizing ensemble learning in liquefaction prediction. To this extent, this work examines useful ensemble learning approaches for seismic-induced liquefaction prediction. A comprehensive analysis of fifteen ensemble models is performed. The results show improved prediction performance and diminishing uncertainty of ensembles, compared with single machine learning models.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]  
Fisher A, 2018, ARXIV180101489
[22]   A Review on Ensembles for the Class Imbalance Problem: Bagging-, Boosting-, and Hybrid-Based Approaches [J].
Galar, Mikel ;
Fernandez, Alberto ;
Barrenechea, Edurne ;
Bustince, Humberto ;
Herrera, Francisco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2012, 42 (04) :463-484
[23]  
Gelbart MA, 2014, UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P250
[24]   Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence [J].
Ghahramani, Zoubin .
NATURE, 2015, 521 (7553) :452-459
[25]   Neural-network modeling of CPT seismic liquefaction data [J].
Goh, ATC .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1996, 122 (01) :70-73
[26]   SEISMIC LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ASSESSED BY NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
GOH, ATC .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (09) :1467-1480
[27]   A Bayesian network approach for predicting seismic liquefaction based on interpretive structural modeling [J].
Hu, Ji-Lei ;
Tang, Xiao-Wei ;
Qiu, Jiang-Nan .
GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2015, 9 (03) :200-217
[28]   New diversity measure for data stream classification ensembles [J].
Jackowski, Konrad .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 74 :23-34
[29]   Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation [J].
Juang, CH ;
Jiang, T ;
Andrus, RD .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (07) :580-589
[30]   Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests [J].
Juang, CH ;
Chen, CJ ;
Jiang, T ;
Andrus, RD .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (06) :1195-1208