Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma

被引:159
|
作者
Kim, Seong Jae [1 ]
Cho, Kyong Jin [2 ]
Oh, Sejong [3 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Jinju, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Cheonan, South Korea
[3] Dankook Univ, Dept Software Sci, Yongin, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
FIBER LAYER MEASUREMENTS; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; DETECTION ABILITY; CLASSIFIERS; THICKNESS; MYOPIA; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0177726
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The study aimed to develop machine learning models that have strong prediction power and interpretability for diagnosis of glaucoma based on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and visual field (VF). We collected various candidate features from the examination of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and visual field (VF). We also developed synthesized features from original features. We then selected the best features proper for classification (diagnosis) through feature evaluation. We used 100 cases of data as a test dataset and 399 cases of data as a training and validation dataset. To develop the glaucoma prediction model, we considered four machine learning algorithms: C5.0, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). We repeatedly composed a learning model using the training dataset and evaluated it by using the validation dataset. Finally, we got the best learning model that produces the highest validation accuracy. We analyzed quality of the models using several measures. The random forest model shows best performance and C5.0, SVM, and KNN models show similar accuracy. In the random forest model, the classification accuracy is 0.98, sensitivity is 0.983, specificity is 0.975, and AUC is 0.979. The developed prediction models show high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in classifying among glaucoma and healthy eyes. It will be used for predicting glaucoma against unknown examination records. Clinicians may reference the prediction results and be able to make better decisions. We may combine multiple learning models to increase prediction accuracy. The C5.0 model includes decision rules for prediction. It can be used to explain the reasons for specific predictions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting ACL Reconstruction Failure with Machine Learning: Development of Machine Learning Prediction Models
    Alaiti, Rafael Krasic
    Vallio, Caio Sain
    da Silva, Andre Giardino Moreira
    Gobbi, Riccardo Gomes
    Pecora, Jose Ricardo
    Helito, Camilo Partezani
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2025, 13 (03)
  • [32] Explainable machine learning models for early gastric cancer diagnosis
    Du, Hongyang
    Yang, Qingfen
    Ge, Aimin
    Zhao, Chenhao
    Ma, Yunhua
    Wang, Shuyu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [33] Supervised machine learning models applied to disease diagnosis and prognosis
    Mariani, Maria C.
    Tweneboah, Osei K.
    Bhuiyan, Md Al Masum
    AIMS PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 6 (04): : 405 - 423
  • [34] Differential Diagnosis of Thyrotoxicosis by Machine Learning Models with Laboratory Findings
    Kim, Jinyoung
    Baek, Han-Sang
    Ha, Jeonghoon
    Kim, Mee Kyoung
    Kwon, Hyuk-Sang
    Song, Ki-Ho
    Lim, Dong-Jun
    Baek, Ki-Hyun
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [35] Machine Learning-Based Classification Models for Diagnosis of Diabetes
    Jaiswal S.
    Jaiswal T.
    Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2022, 15 (06) : 813 - 821
  • [36] Comparison of ischemic stroke diagnosis models based on machine learning
    Yang, Wan-Xia
    Wang, Fang-Fang
    Pan, Yun-Yan
    Xie, Jian-Qin
    Lu, Ming-Hua
    You, Chong-Ge
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [37] Performances of Machine Learning Models for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
    Arjaria S.K.
    Rathore A.S.
    Bisen D.
    Bhattacharyya S.
    Annals of Data Science, 2024, 11 (01) : 307 - 335
  • [38] By artificial intelligence algorithms and machine learning models to diagnosis cancer
    Agarwal S.
    Yadav A.S.
    Dinesh V.
    Vatsav K.S.S.
    Prakash K.S.S.
    Jaiswal S.
    Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 80 : 2969 - 2975
  • [39] A Recommendation Mechanism of Selecting Machine Learning Models for Fault Diagnosis
    Sun, Wen-Lin
    Huang, Yu-Lun
    Yeh, Kai-Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS (ICINCO), 2022, : 49 - 57
  • [40] Applications of Machine Learning Predictive Models in the Chronic Disease Diagnosis
    Battineni, Gopi
    Sagaro, Getu Gamo
    Chinatalapudi, Nalini
    Amenta, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (02):