Cost-Effectiveness of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin and Gentamicin for Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and/or Endocarditis

被引:29
作者
Bhavnani, S. M. [1 ]
Prakhya, A. [1 ]
Hammel, J. P. [1 ]
Ambrose, P. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ordway Res Inst, Inst Clin Pharmacodynam, Albany, NY USA
关键词
COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; IV; CEFTRIAXONE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1086/604710
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasingly common cause of bacteremia and endocarditis. The cost-effectiveness (CE) of daptomycin was compared with that of vancomycin-gentamicin in patients with MRSA bacteremia with or without endocarditis. Methods. With use of data from an open-label, randomized study comparing daptomycin with vancomycin-gentamicin in the aforementioned patient population, 3 cost strata were considered: (1) study drug acquisition (daptomycin, $0.37/mg; vancomycin, $7/g; and gentamicin, $0.12/mg); (2) stratum 1 plus the cost of therapy for treatment failures and adverse events, therapeutic drug monitoring, and preparation and administration of all medications; and (3) stratum 2 plus hospital bed costs. Drug costs were based on mean wholesale price, with other costs based on those for a typical community hospital. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as cost divided by proportion of successes. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the study drug cost. Results. Forty-five (20 successes) and 44 (14 successes) patients received daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin, respectively. The respective median cost-effectiveness ratios for daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin for each cost stratum were as follows: $4082 (range, $1062-$13,893) and $560 (range, $66-$1649) for stratum 1 (P < .001); $4582 (range, $1109-$21,882) and $1635 (range, $163-$33,444) for stratum 2 (P = .026); $23,639 (range, $6225-$141,132) and $26,073 (range, $5349-$187,287) for stratum 3 (P = .82). Sensitivity analyses indicated that if the cost of vancomycin was $0, strata 3 cost-effectiveness ratios did not differ ($23,639 and $25,668, respectively; P = .85). Similar results between groups were seen among patients with bacteremia. Conclusions. When all costs of therapy were considered, the cost-effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin was similar, even if the cost of vancomycin was $0.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 698
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia -: Recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study[J]. Chang, FY;Peacock, JE;Musher, DM;Triplett, P;MacDonald, BB;Mylotte, JM;O'Donnell, A;Wagener, MM;Yu, VL. MEDICINE, 2003(05)
  • [2] Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia:: A meta-analysis[J]. Cosgrove, SE;Sakoulas, G;Perencevich, EN;Schwaber, MJ;Karchmer, AW;Carmeli, Y. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003(01)
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Dresser, LD;Niederman, MS;Paladino, JA. CHEST, 2001(05)
  • [4] Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Fowler, Vance G., Jr.;Boucher, Helen W.;Corey, G. Ralph;Abrutyn, Elias;Karchmer, Adolf W.;Rupp, Mark E.;Levine, Donald P.;Chambers, Henry F.;Tally, Francis P.;Vigliani, Gloria A.;Cabell, Christopher H.;Link, Arthur Stanley;DeMeyer, Ignace;Filler, Scott G.;Zervos, Marcus;Cook, Paul;Parsonnet, Jeffrey;Bernstein, Jack M.;Price, Connie Savor;Forrest, Graeme N.;Faetkenheuer, Gerd;Gareca, Marcelo;Rehm, Susan J.;Brodt, Hans Reinhardt;Tice, Alan;Cosgrove, Sara E. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006(07)
  • [5] Recurrent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia:: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis findings in 29 patients[J]. Fowler, VG;Kong, LK;Corey, GR;Gottlieb, GS;McClelland, RS;Sexton, DJ;Gesty-Palmer, D;Harrell, LJ. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999(05)
  • [6] MICROCOST ANALYSIS OF INPATIENT DISPENSING AND ADMINISTRATION OF ORAL SOLIDS[J]. HATOUM, HT. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1990(04)
  • [7] Cost comparison of single daily i.v. doses of ceftriaxone versus continuous infusion of cefotaxime[J]. Hitt, CM;Nightingale, CH;Quintiliani, R;Nicolau, DP. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1997(14)
  • [8] Pharmacoeconomics of a pharmacist-managed program for automatically converting levofloxacin route from i.v. to oral[J]. Kuti, JL;Le, TN;Nightingale, CH;Nicolau, DP;Quintiliani, R. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2002(22)
  • [9] SLOW RESPONSE TO VANCOMYCIN OR VANCOMYCIN PLUS RIFAMPIN IN METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS ENDOCARDITIS[J]. LEVINE, DP;FROMM, BS;REDDY, BR. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991(09)
  • [10] Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity[J]. Lodise, Thomas P.;Lomaestro, Ben;Graves, Jeffrey;Drusano, G. L. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008(04)