Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Azithromycin Prescribing in Primary Care Clinics

被引:9
|
作者
May, Alexandria [1 ]
Hester, Allison [1 ]
Quairoli, Kristi [1 ]
Wong, Jordan R. [1 ]
Kandiah, Sheetal [2 ]
机构
[1] Grady Hlth Syst, Dept Pharm, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
clinical decision support; antibiotic stewardship; ambulatory; primary care; ANTIBIOTIC USE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-06546-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Inappropriate use of antibiotics in the outpatient setting is a common problem, yet literature evaluating best practices for stewardship interventions in this setting is sparse. Objective To evaluate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) order panels for azithromycin prescribing on the percentage of inappropriate azithromycin prescriptions in primary care clinics. Design Single-center, retrospective analysis of azithromycin prescribing within nine primary care clinics. Pre-intervention and post-intervention data included azithromycin prescriptions from November 2016 to April 2017 and February 2019 to July 2019, respectively. Key exclusion criteria included prescriptions for the treatment of a sexually transmitted infection or for prophylaxis against Mycobacterium avium complex. Intervention The azithromycin CDS panel was created to provide point-of-care information on appropriate use of azithromycin along with recommended alternatives based on indications. CDS panels were implemented on January 10, 2019. Main Measures The primary composite outcome was the change in the percentage of inappropriate azithromycin prescribing before and after implementation of CDS panels. The composite outcome included prescriptions with inappropriate indications for azithromycin, unnecessary prescriptions, inappropriate treatment durations, and/or inappropriate dose. Key Results There were 306 and 263 prescriptions for azithromycin prescriptions included for analysis in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. Inappropriate prescriptions decreased by 12.6% from the pre- to post-intervention period (81.4% vs. 68.8%; P < 0.001). In both the pre- and post-intervention period, bronchitis and unspecified upper respiratory tract infections (URI) were the two most common indications where azithromycin was prescribed inappropriately. Conclusions Implementation of CDS order panels resulted in a reduction in inappropriate azithromycin prescribing. However, additional improvement in azithromycin prescribing is needed especially for the indications of bronchitis and unspecified URI.
引用
收藏
页码:2267 / 2273
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current Status and Future Directions for Electronic Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support to Improve Diabetes Management in Primary Care
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 : S26 - S34
  • [32] Pharmacogenomic testing to support prescribing in primary-care: a structured review of implementation models
    Hayward, Judith
    McDermott, John
    Qureshi, Nadeem
    Newman, William
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2021, 22 (12) : 761 - 777
  • [33] Prevalence of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care Clinics within a Veterans Affairs Health Care System
    Shively, Nathan R.
    Buehrle, Deanna J.
    Clancy, Cornelius J.
    Decker, Brooke K.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 62 (08)
  • [34] Evaluating a Prototype Clinical Decision Support Tool for Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care
    Allen, Katie S.
    Danielson, Elizabeth C.
    Downs, Sarah M.
    Mazurenko, Olena
    Diiulio, Julie
    Salloum, Ramzi G.
    Mamlin, Burke W.
    Harle, Christopher A.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 13 (03): : 602 - 611
  • [35] Clinical decision support methods for children and youths with mental health disorders in primary care
    van Venrooij, Lennard T.
    Rusu, Vlad R.
    Vermeiren, Robert R. J. M.
    Koposov, Roman A.
    Skokauskas, Norbert
    Crone, Matty R.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2022, 39 (06) : 1135 - 1143
  • [36] Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake
    Moxey, Annette
    Robertson, Jane
    Newby, David
    Hain, Isla
    Williamson, Margaret
    Pearson, Sallie-Anne
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2010, 17 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [37] The impact of personalized clinical decision support on primary care patients' views of cancer prevention and screening: a cross-sectional survey
    Saman, Daniel M.
    Chrenka, Ella A.
    Harry, Melissa L.
    Allen, Clayton I.
    Freitag, Laura A.
    Asche, Stephen E.
    Truitt, Anjali R.
    Ekstrom, Heidi L.
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
    Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y.
    Elliott, Thomas E.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [38] The impact of personalized clinical decision support on primary care patients’ views of cancer prevention and screening: a cross-sectional survey
    Daniel M. Saman
    Ella A. Chrenka
    Melissa L. Harry
    Clayton I. Allen
    Laura A. Freitag
    Stephen E. Asche
    Anjali R. Truitt
    Heidi L. Ekstrom
    Patrick J. O’Connor
    JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen
    Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss
    Thomas E. Elliott
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [39] Clinician adherence to pharmacogenomics prescribing recommendations in clinical decision support alerts
    Nguyen, Jenny Q.
    Crews, Kristine R.
    Moore, Ben T.
    Kornegay, Nancy M.
    Baker, Donald K.
    Hasan, Murad
    Campbell, Patrick K.
    Dean, Shannon M.
    Relling, Mary, V
    Hoffman, James M.
    Haidar, Cyrine E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 30 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [40] Analysis of Appropriateness of Outpatient CT and MRI Referred From Primary Care Clinics at an Academic Medical Center: How Critical Is the Need for Improved Decision Support?
    Lehnert, Bruce E.
    Bree, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (03) : 192 - 197