Invoking culture in medical education research: A critical review and metaphor analysis

被引:25
作者
Bearman, Margaret [1 ]
Mahoney, Paige [1 ]
Tai, Joanna [1 ]
Castanelli, Damian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Watling, Christopher [4 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning CRADLE, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Hlth, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperat Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Western Univ, Ctr Educ Res & Innovat, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1111/medu.14464
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction 'Culture' is a word frequently invoked within medical education literature to explain challenges faced by learners in practice. While social settings and practices are widely acknowledged as critical influences on medical education, there is vast variability in how the term 'culture' is employed. This may lead to confusion, resulting in assumptions and oversights. Objective This critical literature review aims to characterise how the term 'culture' is explicitly and implicitly conceptualised in medical education research. Methods Four leading English language journals in the medical education field were searched in a twelve-month period for research papers or reviews that mentioned culture in title or abstract in a substantive way. A content analysis was undertaken of extracted definitions. In addition, metaphor analysis was used to identify conceptual metaphors, which were subsequently clustered thematically. Results Our search yielded 26 papers, 8 of which contained definitions, mostly from the organisational literature. We interpreted nine conceptual metaphors related to how the term culture was employed (terroir, divider, dominant force, toxic force, obstacle, microclimate, object, brand and holdall) in four categories (unchanging, powerful, can adapt around, can be used). Discussion This critical review reveals that medical education as a field: 1) draws most explicitly from the organisational literature; 2) invokes culture in multiple means but in ways that privilege either acontextual human agency or all-powerful social forces; and 3) regards culture as a negative or neutral force but rarely a positive one. There is a notable absence around conceptualisations of 'culture' that allow educator, student and administrator agency but at the same time acknowledge the deep forces that various social settings and practices exert. Other literatures investigating learning cultures and cultural reflexivity focus on this nexus and may provide possible means to advance considerations of culture within medical education research.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 911
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] What really matters for successful research environments? A realist synthesis
    Ajjawi, Rola
    Crampton, Paul E. S.
    Rees, Charlotte E.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 52 (09) : 936 - 950
  • [2] Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism
    Archer, Margaret S.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2010, 28 (03) : 272 - 303
  • [3] Archer Margaret Scotford., 2007, MAKING OUR WAY WORLD
  • [4] Cultural Reflexivity in Health Research and Practice
    Aronowitz, Robert
    Deener, Andrew
    Keene, Danya
    Schnittker, Jason
    Tach, Laura
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 105 : S403 - S408
  • [5] Defining and Measuring Engagement and Learning in Science: Conceptual, Theoretical, Methodological, and Analytical Issues
    Azevedo, Roger
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 50 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [6] Invoking culture in medical education research: A critical review and metaphor analysis
    Bearman, Margaret
    Mahoney, Paige
    Tai, Joanna
    Castanelli, Damian
    Watling, Christopher
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 55 (08) : 903 - 911
  • [7] Do organizational cultures of Canadian medical schools promote a quality culture?
    Blouin, Danielle
    Tekian, Ara
    Harris, Ilene B.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (06) : 662 - 667
  • [8] Bourdieu Pierre., 1990, The Logic of Practice, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
  • [9] Theory, a lost character? As presented in general practice education research papers
    Brown, James
    Bearman, Margaret
    Kirby, Catherine
    Molloy, Elizabeth
    Colville, Deborah
    Nestel, Debra
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 53 (05) : 443 - 457
  • [10] Butler Judith, GENDER TROUBLE FEMIN, P175