Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in a Sample of Incarcerated Women With Substance Use Disorder and PTSD

被引:155
作者
Zlotnick, Caron [1 ]
Johnson, Jennifer [2 ]
Najavits, Lisa M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Butler Hosp, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, McLean Hosp, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
COOCCURRING DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS; PREVALENCE; COMMUNITY; OUTCOMES; INMATES; ABUSERS; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.beth.2008.09.004
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This randomized controlled pilot study compared a cognitive-behavioral therapy (Seeking Safety; SS) plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) to TAU-alone in 49 incarcerated women with substance use disorder (SUD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; full or subthreshold). Seeking Safety consisted of a voluntary group treatment during incarceration and individual treatment after prison release. TAU was required in the prison and comprised 180 to 240 hours of individual and group treatment over 6 to 8 weeks. Assessments occurred at intake, 12 weeks after intake, and 3 and 6 months after release from prison. There were no significant differences between conditions on all key domains (PTSD, SUD, psychopathology, and legal problems); but both conditions showed significant improvements from intake to later time points on all of these outcomes across time. Secondary analyses at follow-up found trends for SS participants improving on clinician-rated PTSD symptoms and TAU participants worsening on self-reported PTSD symptoms. Also, SS demonstrated continued improvement on psychopathology at 3 and 6 months, whereas TAU did not. However, alcohol use improved more for TAU during follow-up. Satisfaction with SS was high, and a greater number of SS sessions was associated with greater improvement on PTSD and drug use. Six months after release from prison, 53% of the women in both conditions reported a remission in PTSD. Study limitations include lack of assessment of SS outcomes at end of group treatment; lack of blind assessment; omission of the SS case management component; and possible contamination between the two conditions. The complex needs of this population are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 336
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Trauma research: A new era [J].
Alexander, DA .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1996, 41 (01) :1-5
[2]  
Attkisson C C, 1982, Eval Program Plann, V5, P233, DOI 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-X
[3]   INTERVENTIONS WILMER - A CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR SUBSTANCE-ABUSERS IN THE CRIMINAL-JUSTICE SYSTEM [J].
BARTHWELL, AG ;
BOKOS, P ;
BAILEY, J ;
NISENBAUM, M ;
DEVEREUX, J ;
SENAY, EC .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, 1995, 27 (01) :39-47
[4]  
Battle CL, 2003, TRAUMA AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES, AND TREATMENT OF COMORBID DISORDERS, P209, DOI 10.1037/10460-011
[5]  
Blake D.D., 1990, BEHAV THERAPIST, V18, P187
[6]  
BLAKE DD, 1995, J TRAUMA STRESS, V8, P75, DOI 10.1002/jts.2490080106
[7]  
Bloom B., 2003, GENDER RESPONSIVE ST
[8]  
Briere J., 1996, Measurement of stress, trauma, and adaptation
[9]  
*BUR JUST STAT, 2005, PRIS STAT
[10]  
*BUR JUST STAT, 2002, PRIS 2002